You are my sunshine
brewbellyblueberry @ brewbellyblueberry @sopuli.xyz Posts 4Comments 109Joined 2 yr. ago
least brutal 3-year-old/freshly born.
I'm imagining toddlers growing up to hate their parents' music taste, because they already fucking hated it when they played it to them when they were a fetus in utero.
The dad hyped up "fuck yeah I'm gonna teach this kid to love Slayer because I'm playing it to him now when they're in there!". And then they hate it like "THIS IS WHAT THAT SHIT WAS, I HATED IT ALL THE FUCKING TIME, FUCK YOU!"
the mirror is visibly turned on
That's a sentence.
Yeah you wanna use that mirror, yeah?
On top of all that, I wonder how much the types of backports they're rooting for would be used to acquire the kind of material pedophiles are after. I mean kids will be kids either way and be stupid and the people that are after kiddie porn seem more likely the type of people to know their way around and stay hidden, because they're literally predators. These backports will be abused by both "the legitimate" side and criminals, so wouldn't having a "special key" to unlock your backdoor put your children in more danger, especially when you're sleeping sound thinking you're safe and therefore not worried about someone, "breaking in". (Is it still breaking in if they have a fucking key?)
"Valiokunta kehui CSAM-esityksen taustalla olevaa ideaa, eli lasten suojelua verkon vaaroilta:
"Suuri valiokunta katsoo, että asetusehdotuksella on erittäin painava tavoite tehokkaasti ennaltaehkäistä ja torjua lapsiin kohdistuvaa verkkovälitteistä seksuaaliväkivaltaa EU-tason toimin. Valiokunta pitää tärkeänä, että EU-tasolla syntyy selkeä ja sitova oikeudellinen kehys, jolla voidaan tehostaa hyväksikäytön havaitsemista, ilmoittamista ja poistamista. Valtioneuvoston tavoin suuri valiokunta painottaa lapsen edun merkitystä, kun punnitaan ehdotuksen eri osien suhdetta perustuslakiin ja perus- ja ihmisoikeuksiin."
"Lisäksi valiokunta katsoo, että ehdotusta ei voida kannattaa sellaisessa muodossa, että se sallisi massavalvonnan. Valiokunnan mukaan valvontaa pitäisi tehdä ainoastaan tunnistettuihin kohteisiin, eikä siis koko kansan tasolla."
Ehkä olen (ja siis kyllä olen) pessimisti ja en luota siihen että jos kerta ajatuksena on että "tuollaisenaan" sitä ei hyväksytä, mutta vähän jätetään tuolla tavalla epämääräisesti auki että "tunnistettuisiin kohteisiin" voitaisiin kohdistaa ko. valvontaa, niin miten se muuten tapahtuu kuin takaporttien avulla jotka jonkun erityisluvan tai vastaavan kanssa voitaisiin sitten purkaa, koska eipä se nyt ihan hirveästi ihmisten yksityisyyden tai tietoturvan kannalta asiaa muuta - aina jos jotain voidaan väärinkäyttää, sitä käytetään väärin, oli se taho sitten rikollinen tai valtio.
Toivon, että luen rivien välistä vähän liian kyynisesti ja vaikka tässä vähän voi pienesti huokaistakin niin kyllä mulla ainakin foliohattu vielä pysyy tiukasti päässä.
I don't feel that's true coming from more "traditional" art circles. From my anecdotal experience, most people can't tell AI art from human art, especially digital and the kind the examples are from - meaning, hobbyist/semi-pro/pro deviant art type stuff. The examples seem obviously hand picked from both non-AI and AI-side to eliminate any differences as far as possible. And I feel both, the inability to tell the difference and the reason the dataset is what it is is because, well, they're very similar, mainly because the whole deviant art/art station/whatever scene is a masssssive part of the dataset they use to train these Ai-models, closing the gap even further.
I'm even a bit of a stickler when it comes to using digital tools and prefer to work with pens and paints as far as possible, but I flunked out pretty bad, but then again I can't really stand this deviant art type stuff so I'm not a 100% familiar, a lot of the human made ones look very AI.
I'd be interested in seeing the same, artist vs. non-artist survey, but honestly I feel it's the people more familiar with specifically AI-generated art that can tell them apart the best. They literally specifically have to learn (if you're good at it) to spot the weird little AI-specific details and oopsies to not make it look weird and in the uncanny valley.
It’s sad to see how AI advocates strive to replicate the work of artists all the while being incredibly dismissive of their value. No wonder so many artists are incensed to get rid of everything AI.
It's such a shame too. Like you can have a million sensible takes and opinions and views on the topic, pro-AI, but the discussion revolves around the same shit on both sides.
It is an amazing tool, and could be used (and is used, it's just obscured by the massive amount of shit and assholes trolling other people/artists) in so many creative ways. I'd been in a bit of a rut for quite a few years (partially because my brain no make happy chemicals or sleep), but I haven't been as excited about the possibilities and inspired maybe ever in my life (at least not for a decade or nearly two) with art and my own stuff. I'm finally drawing again after way too many years of letting my stuff gather dust.
Permanently Deleted
Permanently Deleted
That was a disappointing Where's Waldo the Nazi. Everyone is either clapping or some shit. Waste of time. At least the dude with the roasted chicken for a hat was fun. 1/5 don't recommend.
It's insane how abruptly things went from "Don't share any information, online, especially anything personal" to "You must be a suspicious person or a criminal if you're not on the net with your real name, face and everything about your life" in the advent of Facebook et al.
We’re going to have to bet on the finns.
Please don't, for the sake of us all, it's the same over here unfortunately.
All of the shit is everywhere already. Fighting this shit is going to have to be a worldwide effort the same way bigots, fascists, nazis etc. are uniting worldwide. There is no place on Earth immune to idiocy, because most people are just idiots and/or fucking suck.
I feel like I'm a little old school in this thread compared to most other replies, but idgaf:
Castlevania: Symphony of the night has the best soundtrack ever, or maybe on par with the first three Silent Hills and its just an awesome game
Also Alundra. Great story, great soundtrack, great everything.
Oh look, an actual sensible comment.
I completely understand that, a 100%. My point still stands, fueling the fire that is the whole problem isn't exactly doing any good even if it might feel good for a moment. You can't leave food laying around and then get mad if you get ants. I even understand the want/fantasy/whatever for violence when you're at the receiving end of it constantly. But there's tons of comments wondering "how are the comments like this" when you don't really need all that much brainpower to see why. Stooping to their level isn't going to do any good and will be used against you by the very people who are privileged/bigoted enough to behave that way and not get shit. Why supply them with ammo is all I'm saying.
And stooping to their level only makes you an asshole, a tad justified one, but an asshole nonetheless. When both sides justify themselves because they're right or justified or whatever the excuse for violence and bullshit is, it's just idiots fighting each other. And while this meme could be in response to violence, it doesn't really read that way - it says respect. If you think you can demand respect, especially by threatening to murder them, from people so clearly uneducated, unintelligent and idiotic that they behave the way these bigoted pieces of shit do, you're going to have a hell of a hard time with everything in life. Just bashing your own head against the wall. That's not how respect works either, especially when it comes to people who you surely know aren't going to do it in any case.
With a post like this, that to them just "proves their point" about whatever, and dressed like this, did you really expect there wouldn't be any assholes? And from the comments, there's assholes on both sides in the comments as much as being angry and pissed is only understandable for one side. Every side is right in their own mind even if one side is completely wrong, but you don't change an idiots view by threatening them or giving them more ammo to attack you with. There's a ton of comments here that don't really work in favor of the cause, but even I'm getting attacked just for stating a fact about feeding trolls and being against violence - violence against disrespect, not violence and people are celebrating that. Which again, only works in favor of the bigots on all levels. But it's clear that there's no sensible discussion happening in this post so I'm out.
I hope things get better, because the assholes affect all of our lives and make things shitty for everyone but themselves. Stay safe.
Whatever you wanna tell yourself. Learn to read.
Enjoy your hateful delusional circlejerk and all the trolls. An asshole is an asshole no matter what flag they fly.
LMFAO "in good faith". Stroking your ego and patting yourself on the back for exactly the same kind of behaviour you're mad at at the people on the other end of the spectrum for? No wonder you're so salty. Keep fueling the fire that makes you miserable, but don't cry about it when it burns you.
Sure, buddy lmao. I don't know what your problem is and I don't really care. The only one here that's mad about anything is you. Keep feeding the trolls and wondering why your life is so miserable. Have fun, love.
- Post trollbait
- Get trolls
- Rage about all the trolls
- WHY IS MY LIFE LIKE THIS?!
You do you, if that's how you want to live. You're seriously going to act like this post was a sensible and reasonable opening for discussion? Never did I say anything about discussing violence, but this post isn't a discussion in any way and you know it.
You expect something that literally threatens people with fatal violence to get sensible discussion? Sure it's a meme and all, but shit like this is just asking for trolls to start shit. No one should get threatened with violence, even in the form of a meme or a joke and it just gives assholes more fuel and no-one wins.
Like there was for a while the whole "Play Mozart/Beethoven to your kid in the womb and they'll be smarter" and shit - there's no way everyone universally likes classical music. I know several older people who don't enjoy music at all, which just seems bizarre.
It's not like every kids gonna pop out and be like "That Mozart's Requiem was some shit, man! Play it again!".