breakingcups @ breakingcups @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

435

Joined

2 yr. ago

Sort of. Headscale is an OSS component that replaces the SAAS Tailscale component but it's not a full replacement. It's still pretty dang good though.

Yeah... That will show them...???

Into the hands of billionaires, who will be the only ones left able to buy up whatever they deem still has value.

Incoming claim about rigged elections from Elon in 3... 2... 1...

That is fucking genius

Apple-store like? So, insanely expensive and of little help? Supported by modern slavery?

I thought that couldn't be true, but yeah, you're right. Over 400,000 active members and more than 580,000 retired members. Odd.

Wow, that's cool

God forbid there's something important to worry about

Microsoft likely does not want to be reliant on an independent company for its AI models if the technology is going to be as revolutionary as many in the industry believe. It is better to control your own destiny than rely on a wild and frenetic company like OpenAI, which has seen a slew of scandals and ongoing drama, including the brief ouster of Altman.

The whole thing must be very satisfying to Musk, who clearly launched xAI out of jealousy of OpenAI’s sudden and massive rise. He co-founded the startup, after all, but left following disputes surrounding its direction, only to see the company launch ChatGPT and kickstart a new AI generation. Now he is teaming up with OpenAI’s largest backer on his own rival startup. Musk also continues to try and sue OpenAI over its transition to a for-profit company, among other issues.

Yes, because Musk hasn't seen a slew of scandals and ongoing drama... Great choice, Microsoft!

Tell me this, because this confuses me. Where are all the Tesla's supposed to go? A junkyard?

Hey, you asked. What part of your comment do you feel is being taken way too seriously?

It's easier to (figuratively) say "You guys are just not understanding my comment. It's all of you who are wrong!" than to just take a second and understand why people don't like what you commented earlier.

It implies that that's a quality you should be judging people on, even if their looks have no bearing on the situation.

Of all the things or even subjects you could have made a comment on in this thread, you left one on the looks of a woman.

She doesn't need your validation. Other Lemmy users don't need your opinion on who's attractive. It's meaningless and detracts from the conversation.

I don't know about this, but I'll settle for accountability on facts. Seems like we have a long way to go still.

That sounds like a declaration of war

Because the people paying them think they're going to earn it back.

When you are a well-known or household name, your presence alone can convince a lot of people to watch whatever product you're in. Not just that, entertainment is inherently a risky business. Replacing unknowns with celebrities means reducing that risk, replacing it with known factors.

In other words, because the market thinks they're worth it.

Is there typically such a massive difference between using http://local_ip:3000 and https://speed.mydomain.com/?

Only if they resolve to different addresses.

Wow, some promise!

It's such a transparent non-answer, one that religious people have been conditioned to accept and not question.

That would imply Trump has a plan