Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BO
Posts
2
Comments
345
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • that's a deliberate geopolitical move to gain direct involvement of the US into the conflict by inciting retaliation from Iran. So they were expecting the repercussion.

    It is a dick move but not as severe as attacking the head of the country. Just imagine during the WW2 the Allied assassinate the Japanese Emperor. It was a no go.

    Man, If you hate someone, find a rational reasons for them to be hated. Not every wrongs can be linked to them. Use your head, not emotion.

  • I like how this comment tries to justify a genocide.

    'Hey, we are the victims here. All these genocidal acts committed by us didn't happen out of thin air. We can't no longer endure them. So please, please let us commit all these atrocities so that we can be the perpetrators instead of the victims.'

    Sincerely,

    -The Zionists-

  • that the kind of people you'll come across in liber-media. You'll find toxic people, but you'll also find accommodating people. If you want to play safe, then I don't think any lemmy or any future-whatever-libre-non-lemmy will suit your taste. Make your own server and just make sure that whoever subscribed to that are up to your expectation.

  • The good thing about lemmy is that it don't get directive from any governments to censor certain issues like what happen to Google, reddit, meta and other social media For any other case, the mods will take care of the instances. If you don't like it, just block whichever instances, communities or users you want. Whats so difficult about that? Nobody is forcing you to be in whatever toxic instance/community is or to read posts that you don't like.

  • Yeah, it could be. May be the sentiment during that time made me think otherwise.

    Anyway to quote NYT,

    We found no evidence his medical care was compromised. But these documents, along with Dr. B’s account and experts’ analysis, reveal important new details about his illness and treatment.

    and...

    The experts said that based on the records, the treatment Dr. Li received, in general, followed the norms of that time for managing the symptoms of coronavirus patients

    bur...

    By the morning of Feb. 6, doctors wrote in the progress notes that Dr. Li was at risk of multiple organ failure. Several physicians we spoke to said that Dr. Li’s condition was so serious that his medical team should have at this point, or before it, considered intubating him and placed him on a ventilator — a higher level of oxygen support.

    The records indicate that Dr. Li had earlier been given oxygen through a nasal tube and then an additional oxygen mask. His medical team also tried to use a noninvasive ventilator on Jan. 19, but wrote that “the patient could not tolerate.”

    It is unclear why Dr. Li was not intubated. Some doctors are more reluctant to intubate young patients; sometimes the patients themselves refuse it. To this day, there is no consensus on when invasive ventilators should be used on Covid-19 patients.

    and...

    According to Dr. B, who arrived at Dr. Li’s intensive care ward around 9 p.m., about two hours after Dr. Li entered cardiac arrest, the hospital’s leadership pushed the medical team to use ECMO because it wanted to show the public that no effort had been spared.

    But several doctors in the room argued that by that point it was too late for it to have been of any use, an assessment that six physicians we talked to agreed with. Dr. B also said putting Dr. Li on ECMO, given its invasive nature, would have been an “insult to his body.”

  • And don't forget the tragic ending suffered by the Dr (can't remember his name) that first brought out the covid issue, and his phone messages were leaked to the public if I am not mistaken. He was left dead with no proper care by the authority.

  • no matter our computational techniques, the diminishing returns in predictive precision is reached far sooner than we achieve general intelligence

    That's very bold presumption. How can they be so sure of this, that any future models can't tackle the issue? have they got proof or something.

  • Yes, that isn't justifiable in your society. Surely you'll be safe and pampered in your society. But, yours you're are not the only one. There are a lot of other societies that are different than yours. How will you be able to interact or even fight them (as foes) if you don't understand them. Thats why you need to understand them so that you'll be well equipped and can plot your strategies for future interactions. To understand them is not equal to agreeing with them.

    Anyway, life will be much more exciting when we are open to new encounters. Just like when we are able to speak many languages, imagine that.

  • Whether OP realizes it or not, it won't matter. Their reply is to provide as an explanation - which I think answers the question well - and not to justify what they did are acceptable or not.

  • nothing's really a genocide as long as ur the victor u get to write history.

    As much as I don't like like this statement, that's indeed the facts - The powerful writes the history. They even can keep a blind on the genocidal parties and bring them o assimilate into their society as long as it is to their advantage. At least that's what happened to Nazis luminaries that happened to move to the other side of Atlantic and behind the iron curtain.