Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BO
Posts
2
Comments
489
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • People have containerized (like literal shipping containers that comply with ISO 668 and its successors, not just software like Docker) data centers that can operate wherever they can hook up power. Put some antennas or satellite receivers on the outside, and you might be able to literally have services running from a moving vehicle or ship.

  • I get that Lemmy skews young and male and not on 2010s social media (like old Twitter) but it's almost like they weren't around for the discussions that the "NotAllMen" hashtag generated, or the coining of the term sea lioning.

  • Amazon is worse for those communities, though. They undercut retailers by even more, and then don't hire local employees at all. In the communities where they do set up warehouses, the working conditions are even worse than Walmart.

  • That kit is $40 on their site. Weird that it's cheaper on Amazon in the first place.

    No, Amazon does this on purpose. If you want to sell on Amazon, the search and recommendation algorithms will make your product hard to find unless you have Amazon fulfillment. But if you sign up for Amazon fulfillment, not only do you have to give Amazon a bigger cut of the price, you have to agree to never sell your product for less than Amazon does, even on your own website with your own fulfillment.

    The FTC sued Amazon for this practice, and that case is progressing. But who knows if the Trump administration is going to maintain the lawsuit, or if the court will rule against Amazon.

  • It is very clear you and your best friend HylicManoeuvre are one and the same person

    I dunno, I think our comment histories are pretty distinct, in both our views/preferences and the topics we're comfortable discussing. I think that's pretty clear for anyone who just wants to take a look. Again, by insisting that we must be alts for the same person with a secret vegan agenda comes off as paranoid and delusional.

  • You are the only one implying preference

    Third party here, jumping into this thread. It's pretty clear that OP didn't say, or even imply, anything about preference, and even put scare quotes around "preference" when responding to you bringing it up. You come off as paranoid and bizarrely defensive in this thread, and it's a bad look.

  • In another thread I was laughing about how U.S. utilities charge for electricity by the kilowatt hour, but charge for piped natural gas by the "therm," which is 100,000 BTUs. BTUs are the energy required to raise 1 pound of water by 1 degree Fahrenheit, like a shitty imperial calorie.

    Confusingly, most gas appliances are marketed as being a certain number of BTUs per hour, but people often omit the implied "per hour" when talking about them, and will talk of their 12,000 BTU stove burner or 30,000 BTU water heater.

    Talking through residential energy use without having a solid command of what unit means what would be confusing.

  • By cherry picking a few Republican priorities designed to spite big tech and totally ignoring the big enforcement efforts that the Biden administration has pursued through the FTC and the DOJ Antitrust Division, in both tech and non-tech industries.

  • The communication that kicked off this whole thing was saying something positive about Trump and something negative about Democrats in direct comparison, on an issue that the Democrats are actually way better on.

    It's not just saying something positive about a political official or party. It's actively saying "this party is better than that party." And he was wrong on the merits of the statement.

    And then amplifying the message using an official account is where it went off the rails. CEOs are allowed to have opinions as individuals. But when the official account backs up the CEO, then we can rightly be skeptical that the platform itself will be administered in a fair way.

  • These fuckers act like they've never heard of Lina Khan. Let's see if Republicans try to replace her with someone with a stronger track record. Or, if they're so serious about tech competition maybe they'll get on board with net neutrality.

    And look, I actually like Gail Slater (the Trump nominee that kicked off this thread). She's got some bona fides, and I welcome Republicans taking antitrust more seriously, and rolling back the damage done by Robert Bork and his adherents (including and probably most significantly Ronald Reagan).

    But to pretend that Democrats are less serious about antitrust than Republicans ignores the huge moves that the Biden administration have made in this area, including outside of big tech.

  • In static electric fields, sure. But the real world has rapidly changing electric fields, and mapping concepts like voltage or resistance to a time dimension starts to require imaginary numbers (and the complex analogue to resistance goes by a different name of impedance). And once you're modeling electricity through those concepts, you can have high current in a particular moment in time where the voltage might not be high. Or where the implied voltage is very high but was actually more of an effect than a cause.

    In other words, if you're simply talking about "resistance," you're already in the wrong domain to be analyzing electrical safety properly.

  • We want to desalinate water so that we have fresh water.

    Doing so generates salt as waste and requires safe/responsible disposal.

    We can sell some of the salt, as a product.

    But the market won't buy all of the salt.

    So the salt just goes back to the "waste" category, and we need to find disposal methods.

    I don't see where scarcity (whether artificial or natural) comes into play. The world has lots and lots of salt, and anyone who wants it can get it very cheap.

  • Voltage and current are related, of course, but Ohm's law is just a simplification of circuit theory for static circuits, and the version most are taught early on assume zero inductance and zero capacitance in the circuit. Drop in an alternating current, some capacitors and inductors, and you've got yourself a more complex situation, literally, with the scalar real number representing resistance replaced with the complex number representing impedance.

    And when you have time variance that isn't a simple sinusoidal wave of electric potential coming from a source, even the definition of the word "voltage" starts requiring vector calculus to even be a coherent definition.

    So when I take a simple battery of DC cells to create a low voltage power source, I can still induce current using some transformers and inductors (which store energy in magnetic field) and abruptly breaking open the circuit so that the current still arcs across high resistance air. That's the basic principle of how a spark plug works. In those cases, you're creating immense voltages for a tiny amount of time, but there's never any real risk of significant current being pushed through any part of a person's body. And as soon as you draw off some of the current, the voltage immediately drops as you deplete the stored energy wherever it is in the system.

    And anything designed to deliver an electric shock to a person (or animal) tends to be high voltage, low current. Tasers, electric fences, etc.

    So it's current that matters for safety. A high voltage doesn't always induce a high current. And current can cause problems even at relatively low voltages.