bobman @ bobman @unilem.org

Posts

4

Comments

1,140

Joined

2 yr. ago

🥱

Because addressing why people want to throw their lives away and kill others is important to solving the problem.

You say "convenient to me." That's cute, you're trying to make this all about me, lol.

What's "convenient for me" is these problems not existing in the first place. Wish that didn't need to be spelled out for you.

Errr... what? I clearly said what I thought.

"I wish you people would realize you’re not as funny as you think you are."

What's your point? Lol.

Right. But, proportionally speaking, who is significantly more likely to go on a shooting spree because they 'feel like they have nothing to live for, so they take their frustration out on society'?

Is it going to be your exceptions, or my rules?

Why don't they tackle the issue at the root: people who feel like they have nothing to live for, so they take their frustration out on society.

Oh wait, that involves reducing the disparity in wealth. I guess we know why the ruling class is making us squabble over gun laws, then.

Please also remember that militia in the context of the 2A references what is now the national guard.

Lol, I love how people like you just say things and assume they are true.

Lol, calm down.

Well, if you can't fight then a gun is your best option.

Can you fight?

Didn't think so.

I was gonna throw in some sarcastic humor

Good. It was probably going to be a lame reddit-joke, anyways.

I wish you people would realize you're not as funny as you think you are.

Try to see things from their perspective.

If they got suckered into buying a gun, they're not going to admit to themselves or anyone else that it was a bad purchase.

Nice, now do Illinois.

I never said you knew less than me, lol.

I said people with more experience than you. That doesn't mean me. Lol.

Anyways. I pity the fool who reads your comment then tries to dabble in explosives. I guess they will get what's coming to them.

Alright. I don't think you're going to see my point so I'll just duck out.

Have a nice day.

Yeah... nah. Look at how the actual state government is set up and who controls it.

Actually, don't. No matter what you're going to believe what you want.

Goodbye. Just gonna block ya.

No. Do you think every red state with blue major cities is purple?

Guess what, that's pretty much all of them. In your mind, with your 'logic', red states don't exist. They're all purple, lol.

I mean, you literally said to call it by a general term to get people to think a certain way about it.

I feel like we should tell them the specific information and let them make their own decision instead of resorting to sly tricks like this.

Even people who are more experienced than you can have issues.

You sound really cocky, so maybe it's good you stopped messing with explosives, lol.

No, but republicans do run the state.

That's fine, but it seems disingenuous to use the general term 'health care' when you could be more specific with what that health care actually is.

Well, Texas isn't a purple state. It's a red one.

As far as blue city is concerned, he's saying that it makes more sense for the red state of texas to have more republican mayors, which it does.

So... I'm not really sure what your point is here.