blazera @ blazera @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

977

Joined

1 yr. ago

Yeah i bet she wont even try to get elected next year

Ive only seen articles on the ruling. Link me to the packet please

You vote exclusively for candidates that actively support and benefit from first past the post, and are fighting against a candidate that actively supports getting rid of it. You cant claim to want to get rid of it

Oh plenty of other people are having the same issues of republicans and democrats kicking them off the ballots

This is insane. Youre demanding they win more elections but also demand they dont run because theyre spoilers, despite supporting their policies? Gee I wonder why theyre having a hard time getting elected.

Do you have the packet to see? I want to see whats so clear about it being invalid

Thinking not winning is proof someone doesnt intend to win is ridiculous

No, see jill stein wants to get rid of first past the post. Democrats fight to keep competitors off the ballot because they benefit from first past the post. You are explicitly fighting to keep it.

So does Russia's election committee and its courts after challenge. Or maybe i should get some clarification, do you think russia has free and fair elections? I have been just assuming.

Yeah, thats the decision she gets to make, to run. Not whether or not she gets elected. She hasnt won and somehow that means she has no intention to.

https://www.gpelections.org/?t=2022

Does the word pennsylvania make restricting free and fair elections okay?

Explain it to me then. Lay out your game plan that changes the foundation, that doesnt involve electing a different party

Why are you fighting so hard to retain the spoiler effect?

Its hard to have issues that you're the one causing for others. Just about all third parties are having the same issue. Green party, socialist party, constitution party.

Jesus christ you get the form straight from the secretary of state and youre gonna call them stupid for thinking its valid? This is obvious sabotage, how can you have no criticism of the secretary, the person in charge of running the election, for handing out bogus forms.

And russia runs its. I guess there isnt much in the constitution about free or fair elections

The exact same thing that happened in Pennsylvania. A state body ruling that some signatures werent allowed, so the candidate is barred from participating in the election.

A state body regulating elections. it was even a ruling that decided some signatures werent allowed.

Right, same as in Russia. Its obvious BS