blandfordforever @ blandfordforever @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

249

Joined

2 yr. ago

Your point is that doing something is more effective than doing nothing? You sure got me there. I have to say that I agree.

My state is nowhere near anywhere close to being a swing-state. My vote for president carries very little weight. For this reason, I vote for whichever party actually aligns with my ideology.

An acquaintance once tried to scapegoat me and my vote for Jill Stein as the reason that Donald Trump won in 2016.

That's not how the electoral college works.

Oh, you're right. In that case, the nurse is stealing from the patient and not an evil, faceless corporation. This changes everything.

I'm on the nurse's side. Fuck the credit card company.

Your options are wretched vs horrific.

The time capsule also contains a copy of his book, "Swedish made penis enlarger pumps and me. Yes, this sort of thing is my bag, baby"

Don't be ridiculous. He has a lawnmower in one hand and a chainsaw in the other.

"do not push this red button"

As time goes on, I am more and more convinced that media piracy is morally acceptable.

The technologically illiterate pirate is an easy target.

Especially if there were weaker intermolecular forces (which normally give it surface tension).

At first, I wasn't sure where I was supposed to be looking. Thank you red arrow.

Hold shift while you click start and shutdown (or reboot) when necessary. This will have windows do a full shutdown instead of a hybrid shutdown.

Greg must be a very patient man because Lauren seems exhausting.

The implication that other waters may not be fart free has scarred me forever.

I'm still not understanding the part where everyone having an extra 25k for a house purchase doesn't just increase the price of all houses by 25k. This is what happens when you increase the demand for something without increasing the supply.

Pirating their content doesn't afford you legal protections but agreeing to their license agreements could definitely turn out to have been a big mistake.

If you're just itching for that content, pick your poison.

My friend, in california, every house costs a million dollars. All this is going to do is bump up the value of a house by 2.5% at the expense of taxpayers. Unless we're going to massively increase tax on the rich and cut tax for the poor, I don't see this as a win.

Maybe I'm missing somethng here. I'm not just asking this because I'm upset about the possibility of other people getting money and not me: Wouldn't we expect the home buyers' subsidy to only increase demand and drive up the cost of houses? Then the money would end up in the hands of those who already own one or many houses. Isn't this just giving money to people who are already well-off? Wouldn't it be better to create a program focused on building more houses instead?

It looks like a Ford transit van had sex with a Honda element. I like it.