That seems so weird. Linked in is simply a way to connect with co-workers so you can contact them when you're no longer at the same job. I don't have them in my Facebook, I didn't have them in my phone, but if I want to contact them for connections or anything, LinkedIn is the place for that. How much you interact with the posting garbage is entirely up to you. I do it extremely little and I have no problem with LinkedIn.
It's fine to have that opinion, but I wholeheartedly disagree. Often the thing you love about a show is the story and the characters and the world. When a good show ends, you often want more. More story, more of that world, more of that universe, more of those characters, etc.
The only thing worse than a bad story is a really, really good story that ends way too quickly. It's like having one bite of a really good meal. I mean that bite was amazing, but fuck you for showing me what I could have, and then not letting me have it. I'd have preferred not having that bite in the first place.
As an engineering manager, I've already received AI cover letters. Don't do that. They suck. They get "round filed" faster than no cover letter at all. It's insulting.
(Realistically if I couldn't tell the difference then it would be fine, but right now it's so fucking obvious.)
That's funny, I actually think she has to be way more careful on the run-up to the election. After the election she can go ham if she wants . She really can't yank the carpet out from under netanyahu's feet before the election.
Netanyahu is clearly courting Republicans with the assumption that Trump is going to win. That was the gamble that looked a lot more certain from his perspective before Biden dropped out last week.
Standard presidential strategy (pre-trump) is to "run to the center" once the primaries are over. Yes this is disappointing, but I'll judge her by her actions. She also didn't attend Netanyahu's speech, but that could just as easily have been travel logistics or it could have been a snub to Netanyahu who is courting Trump and the R's.
She's not my favorite candidate, but she's miles better than Biden, and Biden's a light-year better than Trump.
I would rather pay an ad-block company a monthly subscription than give it to YouTube in blackmail. This will just be another salvo in a never ending war.
The only way this ever gains traction is if Biden starts abusing the Supreme Court ruling. As long as Republicans see this as something that doesn't hurt them, they will never support it.
It feels like you didn't quite understand... If you've ever read an AI essay, you can see some of the way they currently write. When you see facts and figures thrown in from the internet in terms of what the company does and they sound.... Artificial... It's rather obvious that it was AI written. I'm currently getting AI spam and it's also quite easy to see and detect. It's the same thing.
Someone used an AI tool to write a cover letter and sent it to me. I've seen this a few times. It seems very obvious when you come across it.
I'm sure it'll get better in the future, but right now it needs massaging in order to sound real. There's a very obvious uncanny valley that exists with some AI writing. That's what I'm talking about.
Video shows three cops chasing a suspect. The first cop tackles the kid and proceeds to punch him. The second cop run up with gun drawn and shots the kid in less than a second while the first cop is still busy wrestling.
IMHO, the 2nd cop's shooting was incredibly unsafe since he was shooting a suspect wrestling another cop from less than 1 foot away. As far as I can tell, the cop basically ran up to the kid, put his gun to his head, and pulled the trigger. You can not tell from THIS video if there was a gun in the kids hand, but I can't believe the first cop would not have tackled him if there was! There is no way this is a good shooting.
As an engineering manager, I've already seen cover letters and intro emails that are so obviously AI generated that it's laughable. These should be used like you use them for writing essays, as a framework with general prompts, but filled in by yourself.
Fake friendliness that was outsourced to an ai is worse than no friendliness at all.
That's an interesting read, but I think it misses a point of where that 25% GDP is really coming from. The US makes 25% of the GDP because they outsource. To use other country's labor, other countries people, other other people's brains, and they take a huge chunk of profit from it. They then claim that's their GDP.
America is a very efficient country, with a lot of skilled workers creating a lot of cool products and stuff, but it's not 5x other countries. The only way to get those numbers is by leveraging the work of other people and claiming it for yourself.
Mainly 100% removal from Ukraine (not unreasonable, but also not going happen without Ukraine doing much better on offense) and a shit ton of reparations for all the damage done and people killed (this is never going to happen).
IMHO The most likely scenario is Russia keeps 50 to 80% on land they've already captured and Ukraine agrees not to join NATO and the war stops. Keep in mind much of the land that they're currently fighting over will be useless for a generation due to all the mines and shells shot into it. (Maybe "useless" is too strong, but it will take a lot of work to make it safe for living and farming.)
You seem to have a very immature view of life.