If male tears were the only control, then they run the risk of not finding any result. If you have 3 groups, you need a substantially larger sample size because you are running a less powerful statistical test.
Easier to start with the test that's most likely to work, and narrow it down from there if you succeed
10 years ago was the turning point. I remember as late as 2010 -2012 having to use NDISwrapper to install the windows XP wifi drivers because there were no native drivers so you had to run the windows drivers through an emulation layer to get wifi to work. Even within the past 5 years I've had to compile my own fixes for realtek chips because the auto installed drivers were not working optimally
Ticking the non-free driver box was child's play. As late as like 2012 I remember needing to download NDISwrapper so I could make the windows drivers work through a compatibility layer
This has already been patched on all 64 bit OSes though - whatever 32 bit systems are still in existence in another 15 years will just roll their dates back 50 years and add another layer of duct tape to their jerry-rigged existence
The latter. It sounds like you are sending 100 requests concurrently, not 1m, which makes this fairly trivial
python:
pool = ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=100)
for task in million_tasks:
future = pool.submit(requests.get, task, args, kwargs)
future.add_done_callback(fn_to_handle_result)
Async would probably be better than using a threadpool, albeit with a bit more complexity. Queueing up 1m tasks at once may have a lot of memory overhead so you may need to queue up 100k, free memory, store results, and queue up more before the first 100k finishes
An iPad most likely associated with his business mobile plan. Companies generally cover the roaming charge for it's employees because it means that employee is reachable if shit hits the fan while they are abroad. Mine does, and it's silly to assume it would be any different for someone holding public office.
The only difference here is he went from a country where roaming is free (or like $1/GB), to a country where it is crazy expensive, racked up a ludicrous bill on his company plan, and then hoped no one would notice
This is so every app can only read it's own subfolder. Unless you think it's better that advertisers and app developers can have access to 100% of your personal files
IMO snaps were prematurely pushed but that's about it - they were a worse experience like two years ago when canonical started pushing them and almost every app had some quirk due to the sandboxing, but they have improved to the point that I literally can't remember the last time I encountered an issue with the snap version of a program (granted I only really use snaps when something isn't available as a .deb or there is a conflict)
23% in that week in particular, let alone the X% in the week before and after