Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
0
Comments
1,653
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • Who even are the "white people" they are referring to?

    ghosts, i think.

  • i don't think any conversation here is worth my time. that doesn't impugn my ability refute you.

  • sounds to me like you've alreday decided you know what others think, so there isn't really any point in this discussion.

  • You consider non-white people to be not responsible for their actions because you consider them to be savages that will naturally cause chaos unless under the guidance of the white man. If they are causing chaos it’s somehow the white man’s fault for not guiding them appropriately.

    they didn't say any of this, but you did

  • Glad that you think the Yemenis and Burmese are not human

    this is as bad faith as you could be

  • according to democrats...

    if you didn't vote for Joe biden, you were a trumper

    you were supposed to hold your nose and vote, then pressure him on policy.

    but not now, I guess. wait until he's out of office?

  • the problem wasn't that there was not enough government though, it was that there was too much government. without States, Jim Crow could not have n been made law. abolish the state.

  • this is propaganda. it is funded primarily by universities with ties to the Pentagon.

  • would also err on the side of ethics versus morality

    this makes no sense.

  • I don't know.

    I don't believe in punishment, myself. but the South was obviously punished.

  • don't they teach reconstruction any more?

  • jurisdictions vary. in the us you just have to make an effort to remove it if you're aware.

    ianal

  • that doesnt mean its immoral.

    and as far as i can tell, its not even true. you can be sued for copyright infringement but plagiarism is not codified.

  • plagiarism is an academic crime.

    failing to cite a source is completely amoral.