HACKthePRISONS @ bigMouthCommie @kolektiva.social

you should know i am earnest. i'm learning how to snark. i try to say what

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

1,653

Joined

5 yr. ago

pixelfed

they didn't say that.

Unless you’re saying that you’re not convinced that anybody has ever violated immigration law, so “illegal immigration” is a myth?

i haven't seen compelling evidence about it. but i will say i think borders are immoral and i know my duty vis-a-vis immoral laws.

if we could regain our moral authority, i think we could stop a genocide.

i think that's bluster. in fact, i say "let them". let them. i don't want to be complicit in their genocide. let them beg putin.

So I don’t expect you to come around. I’m just posting this so any other person who comes along will realize that your position doesn’t come from a place of rational thought.

any intellectually honest user who reads this thread can only conclude that the nomination was rigged.

have they even threatened to do something like that? i don't think that would work out for them.

lol

appeal to ridicule

No, it’s not. Has anybody ever been removed from a country when they’ve been caught jay walking? Even a fine is extremely rare. Being in a country illegally is a more serious offense by a pretty large margin.

what makes you think anyone is in the country illegally? in america, people are entitle to a trial by a jury of their peers when they are accused of a crime. it looks to me like the accusation is just that, and you'll forgive me if i don't believe the government without proof.

more posturing and rhetoric

i'm not a sanders supporter. i'm an anarchist.

Do you realize that I’ve had “debates” with Trump supporters that follow virtually the same exact pattern?

i'm not interested in a debate at all.

your accusation of dishonesty is bad faith. i'm engaging entirely with the facts here.

this paper doesn't even acknowledge the role the party finances and other resources played in the nomination process, tilting the results at the polls before many voters even had a chance to voice their preference.

from what i understood, they concluded that we shouldn't tell people the 2016 nomination was rigged because it would undermine faith in the system. did i misunderstand that?

i sincerely hope anyone woh thinks you are right reads that paper

when are you going to stop personally attacking other users?

that paper seems more concerned with not undermining the system than finding out with whether the system was undermined. but other replies found the dnc and its members explaining how it was rigged.

tiktok and Facebook use in the US have nothing to do with anything you are rambling about.

Facebook manufactures consent for the military industrial complex and capitalist interests and since it is not overtly controlled by Lockheed or the Pentagon, it's propaganda is more sinister. at least you know who pulls the strings at tiktok

Terrorists don’t get to have a state.

insurgency works. ask Vietnam, Afghanistan, or even the USA. all resisted imperial power through asymmetric warfare. terrorists most definitely get statehood.