HACKthePRISONS @ bigMouthCommie @kolektiva.social

you should know i am earnest. i'm learning how to snark. i try to say what

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

1,653

Joined

5 yr. ago

bad faith talking points that conservatives use.

this is pigeonholing

i just got here. tone it down.

if you could explain it, why didn't you?

locking people in cages is wrong

they could vote for a candidate that cares about the environment, like the green party's jill stein.

your inability to understand software compatibility between mastodon and lemmy is a demonstration of something. your reaction to my use of common conventions only shows a savviness you don't possess.

oh, but you're not mine!

ok but accosting strangers with your religion, and using an app to target them, does seem a bit beyond the pale.

your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith

And people hate vegans because most people want to believe they’re at least “pretty good people”, and the very presence of a vegan challenges that belief. If you’re offended, maybe it’s time to look in the mirror.

is this even provable? has anyone ever said that's why they, themselves, hate vegans?

yea. everyone agrees trump is worse for palestine in that thread

Your head must be deep in the sand if you think that’s true

this looks like a thought terminating cliche. have you considered addressing the substance of what i said, or is it all hand waving and shouting on your end?

If your lifestyle choices cause suffering and atrocity, don’t you think you have a responsibility to at least be aware of what you’re complicit in

yes, but they don't, so it's no big deal.

you should give a trigger warning when you link gore

that doesn't say what you say it said.

no one is raping or torturing animals.

You wouldn’t believe how many posts I’ve seen railing against “genocide” go on to claim that Trump would be tougher on Netanyahu. Saw one a couple days ago that even claimed that because Putin is such an ally of Iran and therefore Hamas that he’d be better for the people of Gaza.

you're right: i don't believe this. can you link it?

people are responsible for their own emotions. the only reasonable definition of terrorism is activity that the existing political status quo does not approve. that's it. it doesn't need to attack someone. it doesn't need to be violent. the Boston tea party was terrorism as surely as the assassination of the arch duke.

and your reply here is pure clueless weirdo that has no ability to comprehend what they read and has no sense of futility

your insults don't bolster your credibility or undermine mine.