Russia have repeatedly admitted it has no chance of beating Nato. Hence the nuclear escalation is the only matter to discuss. A beated nation will press all the buttons.
This is the only elaborated comment here. It's not even any kind of a strong opinion, but still enough to get several dislikes. Probably most of them politics professors, historians, diplomats and military experts.
Yeah, when I read this I was like 'is anyone still denying ads use of microphone?' Eight years ago I would be called paranoid, but now everybody experienced smartphone at it's best.
Ofc I know the Poland partition, but to call them best buds after what happened later? Stalin may have believed that, but for Hitler it was more a tactical gambit.
I know the french should've tried to stop them in the border mountains, but still that's not the point here. I understand we were discussing the international reaction to attacking a country.
Only that time more than half the cartaginian army was about to travel to Italy to follow Hannibal. If Scipios didn't crush them there, the world would be a very different one today.
Still, as from a mechanical engineer perspective I would trust slightly more a combustion motor system to work offline rather than an electrical, where I could never know how the motor really works and relays on.
'They told me to keep it secret, but I regret not talking more about it.' Some things are black or white, don't try to fool us with the 'grey area'. If you didn't outspeak is because your whole purpose was to specifically avoid doing so!
Wo wo wo wo! Who is the rock in the shoe that dislikes this mastapizza?