betwixthewires @ betwixthewires @lemmy.basedcount.com

Posts

0

Comments

220

Joined

2 yr. ago

He was a very high profile criminal.

Hot Tub Time Machine 2 is way better and super underrated.

Burn After Reading.

But you need cars for those places, which means you need parking lots downtown for those people. That traffic in downtown, where you you think it comes from? Those 1 or 2 cars driving down that dirt road, they're driving somewhere or from somewhere. The dirt roads meet at a main thoroughfare, paved, that takes them downtown.

How much did you pay for the eyes?

address car centricism in rural places

only talk about downtown

Most of what goes on in a rural place is far away from downtowns. People don't live in downtown, people live on rural plots of land miles away from downtowns, on dirt roads and things. That's what you'd be addressing talking about car dominated rural areas. How do you get to the very walkable downtown? A train that takes you the next state over is not what we are really talking about when comparing to cities with trams and busses and subways.

As far as the mention of sustainable infrastructure, I'm in agreement with this guy. Rural downtowns are dying because of bad planning. You have to funnel people through the downtown for the land to maintain value, not build 70mph bypasses. But rural areas, not just the downtowns but the whole rural area surrounding it, are not going to be adequately traversable with busses and trains. Bicycles, sure, it takes a long time but it is doable. Walking, alright, but it's a lot of work and can be hours to get a few miles, people just aren't going to do it. Even before cars, people stayed on their land and only went into town every few weeks to do business, and took a horse and buggy along a road.

I don't. Popsocket all the way. Even big men with big hands can't one hand these phones anymore.

I want a small phone with an OLED 1080 display that is supported by lineage OS and has a headphone jack. That's all I want, I don't care about processor or ram being mid, mediocre camera is fine, I need decent storage though, or an SD slot.

No, it would be like if a neurosurgeon and a pediatrician were talking about how badly an ER doctor fucked up, and how he should buy their family a six pack of beer because the dead person wasn't important at all and had little value.

Serving ads to Europeans is doing business in the EU, and the US and EU have reciprocal civil enforcement mechanisms.

No, not clearly. It's not clear that's what he is doing at all.

I feel the same way about communists. Downvotes mean nothing to me.

You're the guy that was plastering my feed yesterday with the Stalin gave India food what a good guy inphographics right?

Doesn't matter man. I don't expect them to go home and cry themselves to sleep at night every night for what they see out there. They need to make dark jokes about junkies, criminals, whatever, I get it, if that's what it takes to not blow your brains out while you're out there dealing with the underbelly. But a cop negligently killed a woman and they're acting like it's NBD. The hit and this show a culture within this particular department of callous disregard for human life.

Well I'm only being facetious insomuch as the OP is annoyed at a perfectly predictable outcome of laws that Europeans wanted. I'm very critical of the GDPR, I do want laws that prevent data harvesting but I just don't think the GDPR was the right approach.

The OP is irritated for some reason, I guess they really wanted that insight.

Meh, this is overblown.

They seized the control servers of the malware operation, used that to send an update destroying the bots, after getting a warrant to do so. In the article it makes it seem like they searched everyone's computer, even though the warrant explicitly forbade them from doing so, saw the bot software and then targeted them. This is not the case.

The warrant explicitly forbade the FBI from searching the computers they for the warrant for. The article implies that they could violate the warrant if they want to. And they could. But by that logic any warrant can be abused, let's just get rid of warrants. And the issue at hand, that the court issued the warrant, is being glossed over on this point. The FBI had this capability, they'll abuse it warrant or no if they're trying to abuse it. The warrant makes no difference. So why even bring up the warrant?

Well, this is what you wanted isn't it? Your government is protecting you, anyone who can't comply can't serve you.

Just change your user agent. Fuckers have no business knowing.

They're the same picture.

well, you have a history of authoritarianism and warrantless detention in many, many European countries, the US is all entirely subject to the US constitution which explicitly forbids warrantless searches, detention absent due process and things like that. It has a few blind spots, and the rules are broken, but generally can be corrected and the culprits prosecuted. Detention in Germany for example without a jury trial and evidence of illegal activity is perfectly legal, as it is in the UK and almost every other European country so long as it protects the general welfare or some other such broad meaningless condition.

I find it funny, you talk about freedom, Europeans will defend their governments as free, shit on the US, defend government power in the name of protecting the public, but then, preemptively jailing people, like previous authoritarian states of Europe would do, and they're all surprised pikachu face. I doubt they'll ever get it, Europeans are lemmings.

Except the French. The French light shit on fire when their government displeases them.