Bernie Ecclestoned @ bernieecclestoned @sh.itjust.works

vintage champagne socialist

---

Read more

Posts

200

Comments

1,340

Joined

2 yr. ago

Mr Farage was also described in one of the emails as an “awful human being”

UK has had 3 mass shootings in the 2020s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:2020s_mass_shootings_in_the_United_Kingdom

US had 620 just in 2020 alone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States_in_2020

We had two mass shootings in the UK and banned guns, no mass shootings since. Same in NZ and Australia.

From the people who are putting their money into it.

Then, why do we need a solid-state battery? It is to increase capacity of EV batteries.

Market research companies expect that EVs will replace ICEVs(internal combustion engine vehicles), and become the mainstream in the auto industry. And to become the unarguable leader in the industry, EV should have the similar level of mileage as the current ICEV, and it is important to increase the battery capacity of an EV battery to do so.

There are two ways to increase capacity. First is increasing the number of batteries. But in this case, the battery price goes up and batteries take up so much space in the vehicle.

A solid-state battery has higher energy density than a Li-ion battery that uses liquid electrolyte solution. It doesn’t have a risk of explosion or fire, so there is no need to have components for safety, thus saving more space. Then we have more space to put more active materials which increase battery capacity in the battery.

A solid-state battery can increase energy density per unit area since only a small number of batteries are needed. For that reason, a solid-state battery is perfect to make an EV battery system of module and pack, which needs high capacity.

https://www.samsungsdi.com/column/technology/detail/56462.html

You seem to be of the belief that no new battery tech ever reaches the market, which is obviously false. There is a lot of work going on to bring this to market. The truth is neither you or I know whether this will happen.

My bet is someone will crack it 👇

No, the theory is that removing a few bad apples is all that's needed to solve the problem when it's actually systematic.

The barrel is the problem.

The potential benefits are enough for Samsung to be building a pilot line. That's an investment, a bet, and there are reasons why:

Higher energy density, which means more power in a smaller size and weight.

Higher safety, as the solid electrolyte is non-flammable and less prone to catch fire.

Shorter charging times, as the solid electrolyte allows faster movement of ions.

A wider range of operating temperatures, as the solid electrolyte is more stable and less affected by heat or cold.

Longer lifespan, as the solid electrolyte reduces the degradation of the electrodes

Thanks

Yeah, the rotten apple nonsense has been shown to be just that. The Met in the UK have been repeatedly shown to be institutionally racist and sexist

Is thirstily the right adverb? I thought that meant sexily

What statistics?

If their job is a cop, then they'd be somewhat correct in that notion?

Because Netanyahu's govt used Hamas to split the Palestinians once it became clear that a two state option was not wanted on either side.

That still doesn't mean Israel funded Hamas.

This was the comment:

And Israel. Israel funded Hamas in the past to weaken the peace-seeking PLO. And even now they allow foreign money to reach them. Can't have your boogieman going broke.

I've seen no source that shows direct funding of Hamas other than the precursor to Hamas that Israel allowed to build mosques and universities, in the 1980's...

I'm also not sure how the Israelis could have prevented Qatari money getting in

I really dgaf what you do mate

Pivotal for who? You think the Australian govt is going to do anything for Asssange? Lol

Wow you swallow propaganda without even chewing, GG!

The link in your 'source' doesn't match the claim...

Also by the same author

The Israeli regime was not the victim on October 7. The Hamas offensive bears no resemblance to the September 11 attacks of 2001 and the Palestinian resistance has nothing in common with Daesh or other takfiri terrorists. The only thing that was out of the ordinary for the conflict in Palestine on October 7, was that for once the fight was taken to the Israelis and instead of it being dead Palestinians, it was dead Israeli soldiers and settlers.

https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-israeli-victim-narrative-about-october-7-is-based-on-wes

🤡

And yet you defend a terror attack where women are raped and children burned alive?

Good luck with that 🤡

That is when Israel 'funded' them. No one has supplied a source of Israel funding Hamas this century.

There's a difference between funding and allowing funds from Qatar and Iran to flow to Gaza