belastend @ belastend @slrpnk.net

Posts

1

Comments

250

Joined

9 mo. ago

Tech-Bro is an almost exclusively male subsection of people in Tech, who think that A. Tech solves everything B. As people doing Tech, they know everything C. Any non-tech attempt at solving something is bad.

This isn't a sexist term.

Rare selfaware ml post

Almost as weird as Islamic Peoples Republic of Kim Il-Sung Thought.

That's a whiplash inducing username

This EO fits into a larger pattern of targeting minorities under the banner of "fixing DEI". The original point of your argument, however, was that this admin does not try to erase trans people.

"The left-wing gender insanity being pushed at our children is an act of child abuse. Very simple. Here’s my plan to stop the chemical, physical and emotional mutilation of our youth,” Trump said about Trans Kids.

Sec. 2. Policy and Definitions. It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.

This entire EO he put out on Day one is entirely about erasing trans people without even mentioning them as "trans". Kicking them out of the military is another step towards this goal of ultimately banning them from every facet of life.

I don't see it as an insult, it is used as one. Especially by this admin.

It's the idea that some is only there because of DEI and without it, their capabilities wouldn't have been enough. Which is wrong.

Before DEIA was implemented, minorities were often not hired, because of their background, even though they were the more capable candidate. And this admin is a perfect example, that "DEI hire"" is projection.

Is Hegseth more capable than his predecessor? Gods no. His signal escapades are enough to prove this.

Is RKJ more capable than his predecessor? Is anyone in this majority white, majority male admin better suited for their job than the more diverse admin before it? No. But still, that admin gets labeled as DEI Hires, not because anyone could prove that DEI prevented a more deserving candidate from filling that position, but because they belong to minorities.

I get it. With Cup+, I get all my cup needs* fulfilled for only 19.95 a month!

*Limited to one cup at a time, revokable at any moment. You are not purchasing a cup, only the license to use it.

First of all, DEI includes things like posting job offerings in spaces that are frequented by lower income or minority populations. It's rejection includes an assumption that the most qualified person for any given position is a white straight man.

People in this Admin have called the former secretary of defense a DEI hire. She was a Black General.

This admin has consistently called any minority a DEI hire and has tried to blame accidents on said "DEI" hires.

Me, when I have to hare a cup because of the avages of communism

Given how much of Tech bro ideology is informed by types like Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin, no there isn't.

Do not mention the "Nanking Incident".

You can. It's called gab ai. And it's everything you just described as impossible.

The hat could double as that in a pinch

Ja natürlich, mein Führer, Sie sind der größte Feldherr aller Zeiten.

That not the CIA. That's an info report submitted to the CIA. If you read the document, the first line states "this is UNEVALUATED info".

It's not an internal report, it's an unevaluated info, received by a source. Not some conclusion the CIA came to.

How are those human shields going? Still using sexual violence against them as a weapon of war?

Fuck Off, fash

Care to explain, what the hell you mean?

If you don't want daddy Stalin to rule you, you are a fascist.