Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BE
Posts
10
Comments
560
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Remove the images and re-do the training. Using the previous AI should be banned except for ethical research, and even so has to get the permission from authorities.

    As an AI fuckboi I don't think anything else is acceptable.

  • As a non-US citizen I'd like to reiterate that you can get rid of this idiocy only by banning guns.

    Not interested in American opinion regrading this one, sorry, it's a super simple fact with no discussion worth wasting time for us.

  • But I'm sure the same problem exists even in countries with higher taxes, also in socialist countries.

    The thing is that developed countries have more elder voters. Even those 100 people on the top wouldn't have control over them even if some of them had a good intent. And there are more than 100 of them, making it even harder to control for the people with good intent.

  • It's nice, but what I feel about these generations is that they, en masse, took advantage of junior generations to enrich themselves – en masse, again. I can't complain too much because my generation is doing the same to the younger generations, and they will do the same also. It's crowd behavior and no one really has a control over it. I wish I could do something but I'm just a powerless individual who thus becomes an accomplice.

    Anyway, my first reaction to this kind of article is thus often "sure, enjoy your spoil, morons". I do think my reaction is unfair, but it's automatic and done subconsciously.

  • I don't have sympathy to GAFA, but the article oversimplifies the reality and jumps to the conclusion here and there. Broken logic is dangerous...

    Edit:

    For example,

    Since its inception, Facebook have been very careful to kill every competition. The easiest way of doing it being by buying companies that could, one day, become competitors. Instagram, WhatsApp to name a few, were bought only because their product attracted users and could cast a shadow on Facebook.

    This is oversimplification. Facebook not only acquired WhatsApp, but wanted access to its user data. So, it's not "only because" they wanted to control WhatsApp before they become a rival.

    The article's logic becomes sloppy like this every few sentences if not words.