be_excellent_to_each_other @ be_excellent_to_each_other @kbin.social

Posts

3

Comments

1,114

Joined

2 yr. ago

I understand the truth of what you are saying. It's just infuriating to witness so much needless bullshit and harm coming from the same group year after year after year.

Aw thanks!

It is. Remember this when you are deciding how angry to get after they acquit him.

My rage wouldn't let me finish the article. Fuck these fuckers, fuck everyone who votes for these fuckers, and fuck everyone who keeps trying to tell me we should just try to "understand" how Republicans got to where they are.

I just want to compliment you on one of the most thorough and nuanced replies I've ever witnessed to such a question.

Plasma 5 made me a KDE user and fanboy. I am super excited to see what 6 will bring.

KDE team, you rock.

OK man. Doesn't bother me if you don't buy one. This is the longest I've kept a printer without throwing it away in disgust in a long time. Companies like to brand things with catchy names. shrug

I'd just about forgotten my paywall bypassing browser extension but this is the second time recently I've accidentally posted paywalled content because it didn't appear to be paywalled to me.

Thanks for the secondary link. Really the pic is enough though. 😁

Thirded. Get an Brother inkvestment model. No bullshit, it just does your bidding, like a printer should. And the ink lasts a very long time.

Yes, everyone says get a B&W laser printer. If that fits your needs do so. We have kids that want or need to print in color fairly often, and color laser was out of the question last time we purchased.

Brother is the now only brand I look at after decades of buying consumer printers. If absolutely forced not to buy Brother, I'd go with Epson. I used to love Canon, but each model started incorporating more and more bullshit, and I found their ink to be both expensive and short lived. HP is the king of printer bullshit, but Canon seems to want to sit on their court in recent years.

So then we as a society aren't ready to untangle the mess of our infancy in the digital age. ChatGPT isn't something we must have at all costs, it's something we should have when we can deploy it while still respecting the rights of people who have made the content being used to train it.

Correction it’s a Southern Surrender Flag now

Oh no, the surrender flag is way more delicious.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/premium/article/confederate-dish-towel-appomattox-surrender-flag

Behold, the final flag of the US Confederacy:

.Voting is the least efficient way to change people’s lives

It's also how you make sure you get the dog not the wolf in the short term. A lot of your other action is going to get a lot harder if Trump takes the whitehouse and never leaves.

First we'd have to wrest control of florida from the grip of the "I got mine" "Slavery was a benefit to the slaves" and "Don't say gay" maga and/or boomer assholes who control the state from the top down.

Then and only then would there be the slightest possibility that anyone in power in Florida would advocate for anything that would actually help anyone.

Until then it's all grandstanding and the Gilead express.

The reinstatement came after notable users such as George Galloway, a former member of the British Parliament, called out Musk for banning the accounts.

(Update at the top of the article)

Wow man. I wrote, "Sheesh."

And you got AAAAAALLLL this:

Scientists actually studying the issue:

“Not sure. We studying the issue.”

Lemmy:

“But I FEEL it’s harmful! I’ve done my research!”

Antivaxxer by any chance? Because you’re tracking the same thought process.

Whenever something like this comes up, of which I’m ignorant, I ask myself, “By what mechanisms could this be true or false? How would that work?”

Your turn.

Yeah, I'll pass.

I don't even use lemmy and that was interesting to read.

Researchers still can’t answer the big question: Are those nanoplastic pieces harmful to health?

“That’s currently under review. We don’t know if it’s dangerous or how dangerous,” said study co-author Phoebe Stapleton, a toxicologist at Rutgers. “We do know that they are getting into the tissues (of mammals, including people) … and the current research is looking at what they’re doing in the cells.”

Sheesh.

Sorry, my joke generating subroutine has not been updated since the time that the rocket scientist idiom you mention was popularized.

😁

But the idiom isn't "it's not AI" it's "it's not rocket science." 😉😁