Barttier @ barttier @feddit.de

Posts

5

Comments

54

Joined

2 yr. ago

Relevant!

"The eight participants[...]"

No.

Sad. You could just get rid of schools instead of this farce.

Is she preganent?

You can't 100% complete it.

The AI is stupid af.

NPCs tend to stand in your way.

Most NPCs have terrible design.

Somebody broke the weather mechanics.

Worst. quests. ever.

The grind is meaningless and unrewarding.

If I kill something I'm the bad guy.

No respawn.

Also bugs. Literally.

Don't you dare!

All in all nearly 10 year though my last account is 7+ years old and this was the time I actually used the site and didn't just lurk. My last account isn't deleted, I just don't use it anymore. Lemmy at first seemed more complicated, but I stayed for the communication culture and the fediverse concept . I'd love to see lemmy grow to a reddit successor but I doubt it will get this big. Then again I wonder if this isn't for the positive. Also it is really refreshing not to be suffocated under rage- and clickbait by some malicious algorithm.

1000 should be enough. 1000 qurans aren't enough for the whole swedish country as well.

I know, that she is getting paid and all. But damn... Thats just degrading. No amount of money would bring me to tell such a embarrassing lie. Alone the word "most" puts every other of her social interactions into scale. She basically said: "Me, my mom, my husband?, my kids?, my best friend, they are all ethically worse than Trump." This person seems to have no values.

Hell, yeah! Sign me in.

Sidenote: Install bidet.

Didn't read, had to laugh. Its funny that they use one of the most used symbols for copy paste to criticise the lack of fresh ideas.

How about hard, angry, rough, degrading love?

I think there are three main problems, that aren't considered properly:

1. Deep sea mining is not intended and will not replace mining on the surface. If anything we will mine more cheaper and with additional impact on the environment.
2. The deep sea and the ecological environment remains widely unknown. We could be attacking species we don't even know and kill animals, that are essential for ecosystems. If we take the nodules we also take the only solid ground in this muddy depths we know so far. Which leads to my third problem -
3. The amount of time those species need to grow is gigantic. Everything is slower with reduced sunlight, so is growth. You simply can compare the ocean ground with forest in that it takes up to or even more than thousand years (estimated) to regrow. Some squid species need 4 years just to breed their eggs. Microbiology is slowed down just as dramatically. This leads to the assumption that we won't kill for regrowing, but for good. Deep sea mining robots might cut dead strips into the ocean that will never recover.

I completely understand the economic argument and the worldwide hunger for resources, but money can't be the final answer and reason for our actions especially when will still don't use the current resources like we value them.

Also reasoning with environmental issues, like the need of rare elements sounds really counterintuitive considering we "kill ecosystems to protect them?"

If we would really care for the environment we would recycle, but we want this materials cheap and that is the only reason we try to get this working.

Why would the pope think that?

They even taste the same - Very good that is

Kill one person and become an hero: If I double it and give it to the next person and this behaviour carries on it would need just a few people until the first guys get the power to kill every human being. In this scenario I kill one person, so no one gets the power to potentially kill 1+n persons which will eventually happen.

Storage. It is possible. Cheaper and safer. Safe potential, and chemical energy. It is even more realistic with current and future power grids.

Solar and wind energy never needed terms like nuclear semiotics. Safe technologies don't need those terms.