barsquid @ barsquid @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

2,359

Joined

1 yr. ago

No, you're right, he only said they should be forced to house incoming "locusts." That's nothing like a Nazi at all. Thanks for setting us straight.

He deliberately sought out an altercation and he deliberately brought his gun.

But it seems like there are other easy distros with lenient requirements that don't try to force Snaps and ads on their users.

Do they rank them by whether or not they'll spam you with physical mail and sell your email? I need an efficient charity that I can give to anonymously.

Who does this? I am only aware of far-right bros angrily making lists of games that have black and/or gay characters.

Repubs are all lunatic terrorists in various stages of radicalization.

That's hilarious. Donald remembers he is in the files in real time.

I think this one is the Senate? The House should be uncapped though.

Fewer Garlands, more Khans.

We could find you some .ml users if your question wasn't rhetorical.

Previously they had to actually talk for so long that nobody could vote on the bill. Now they just send an email, like, "I fillibuster this," and that is that.

Nice to have some reasons to vote for them instead of just voting against nakedly racist authoritarianism.

They're writing assuming the audience is sane and has at least a schoolchild's understanding of 20th Century history.

That's not the part they are going to use, of course, they will pick like this:

"I'm sick of Dems [...] a leftist third party could win, I'd vote there."

It is. They have to create a strawman to support themselves. "Because people are choosing the best fit from the only two viable candidates, they are choosing based purely on which is more popular."

Ah, the "chuck it in a garbage bin" strategy. Very effective.

I think they've switched candidates they're voting for a few times, since they don't have any values other than getting MAGA in office and their preferred candidates don't have any values other than receiving foreign money.

They're mad every time they get called out on campaigning for MAGA. So of course we get "no u" style responses, whether or not it makes any sense whatsoever.

"No, you don't get it, once they get to 5% they are automatically on the ballots. Once serious candidate Jill Stein no longer has her own inept team as the obstacle it is all over for the duopoly! 1 in 20 people voting for her is realistic and it's not like there is a possible disastrous outcome that could occur.

"I couldn't possibly vote for the duopoly since that makes me complicit. I'll just spend tons of time online campaigning for MAGA, which does not make me complicit because of reasons."

If you're against corruption I have a strategy you can use: vote for the viable candidate least likely to accept foreign money for influence.

That's the guy who is thrown out of the window in the meme.