bamboo @ bamboo @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Posts

17

Comments

1,177

Joined

2 yr. ago

Every time I've encountered the ambiguous buttons, I have asked other people and have been told "smaller is for less water/bigger is for more water" and I feel like an asshole wasting water for a little pee. One time I did experiment and did try both buttons and didn't notice a difference really, but i couldn't measure it fully.

Or have the voting age be 18 years old to the average national life expectancy, although i really haven't thought this through too much. I assume if such a situation were to exist, it would be much easier to cut Social Security and Medicare without losing the elderly vote, so that probably would backfire.

On toilets with two flush buttons for different flow rates, if there is a larger button and a smaller button (with no other singe), the larger button should correspond to the lower flow rate. Odds are more people are flushing for pee, and don't need the extra flow, and the more common action should be represented by a larger button. For people who are unsure, lazy, or not looking, they're probably pressing the larger button just for pee, and wasting water if that were to correspond to more water usage, which is wasteful.

I'm so sorry this happened to you. The agent wasn't the same gender? I'm pretty sure that is the protocol?

For me the confusion for a while was the Switch 2 boxes saying "Includes the Nintendo Switch game and the Nintendo Switch upgrade pack.". Now that I'm reading the statement by Nintendo clarifying things, it's clear. This article was the first time seeing them saying the games are exclusively Nintendo Switch 2 game cards. The fact there was enough confusion that there have to be articles published clarifying what Nintendo should have said from the start is my concern with Nintendo marketing repeating the confusion from the Wii U era.

FYI a bunch of your image posts like this one are being redirected through lemmy.ml, so some clients aren't expanding the images. Not sure if that's because these are cross-posts from !memes@lemmy.ml and not sure why they're adding the redirect, but it seems really weird. For example, the URL of this image is

https://lemmy.ml/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeddit.org%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F2c4595bf-e0c2-4c12-9127-f1014f9dfb64.jpeg

It's kinda crazy to me that Nintendo would repeat the same marketing mistakes as the Wii U and release a new console with all this confusion of what games will work with which version.

I haven't really been keeping up with this, seen a lot of conflicting info. Can you buy the cart for Metroid Prime 4 for Switch 2 and use it in the original Switch? Or can you only buy the Switch version and then if used in the Switch 2, get the upscaling benefits, but not any extra content?

Won't anyone think of the Nazi's feelings!?

It's called Transfer Rate, not Cisfer Rate

On browser side implementations or extensions, they can see the input into the form field. As for plain text, generally sites will send the plaintext password over HTTPS when logging in, and it's the server side which hashes/salts, and compares to the value in the DB. Sites can reject or inform users to bad passwords this way, generally when changing the password. Cloudflare does offer a product to do this for sites to add warnings to the user if the credentials were found in a breach. More information on that here: https://blog.cloudflare.com/privacy-preserving-compromised-credential-checking/

Clearly the agent is a DUI hire

You can even get every achievement in a game, and return it for a full refund, granted you can beat the game in under two hours. Someone did it with resident evil 3 remake: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp8a5EjAcGs

Nintendo saw the success of the Wii U and wanted to keep the Switch 2 at ~$470 when adjusted for inflation

Basically what other people in the comments are saying, but here is a video Matt Parker explaining it: https://youtu.be/j04IAbWCszg?t=461

Fantastic vid

There's no way anyone could have predicted this

They had confidence he would cut environmental and consumer regulatory agencies so they could exploit consumers/the earth for a quick buck.

Out of frame is bro jogan

Pretty sure that's Walt Disney, not Andrew Ryan