YouTube-connected the right track still. All these people touting it as an open model likely haven't even tried to run if locally themselves. The hosted version is not the same as what is easily runnable local.
Down votes be damned, you are right to call out the parent they clearly dont articulate their point in a way that confirms they actually understand what is going on and how an open source model can still have privacy implications if the masses use the company's hosted version.
I agree but then again it seems a model doing as good as the others at only 2% the cost would upend expectations as to return on investments from investors. Wait Why did ours cost so much more?
I say no until things start breaking. I've even said no on this and things still play. May be at lower quality at times but I don't care my privacy is worth more than a perfect stream.
Partners with cloudflare to stand on top of arch's shoulders. Seems sus to me. Why is this better than arch? They forked Firefox and also stand on top of librefox's work with unclear additions.
Seems someone just wants to look good on top of others' work. Oh but they compile a bunch of different kernels with random scheduler settings to really give you that edge.
I'm being unfair but what are the benefit of moving to cachy and why would I want to use something supported by cloudflare. I don't trust cloudflare any more than Google or Microsoft at this point.
YouTube-connected the right track still. All these people touting it as an open model likely haven't even tried to run if locally themselves. The hosted version is not the same as what is easily runnable local.