Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AU
Posts
2
Comments
367
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • Guy from HK in my DMs trying to get me to video call him.

    There are plenty of scammers out there too, but some people are just lonely or curious. They might’ve just recently got internet and the only interaction they’ve had previously is from within their slum.

  • It’s just my own analysis all things considered in alignment with Strauss-Howe generational theory which predicts a mass realignment within the next ten years.

    Unfortunately hellish dystopia realignment is the most probable currently. But the fascists have co-opted Bitcoin so probably pump anyway.

  • Below is a probability‑weighted baseline for Bitcoin’s average spot price (USD) in each calendar year through 2035, with an 80 % confidence band that reflects:

    • Crypto‑native factors – post‑halving supply shocks in 2024 and 2028, ETF demand, miner economics.
    • Macro & policy vectors – the stagflation/authoritarian scenarios you asked about, plus rates, dollar strength, CBDCs and potential crack‑downs.
    • Adoption growth – institutional weight (e.g., spot‑ETF inflows) and retail penetration in the US/UK.
    YearExpected Avg. Price80 % BandPrimary Drivers & Assumptions
    2025$130 k$ 90 k – $ 160 kPost‑2024 halving tailwind, spot‑ETF inflows ($4 bn in three weeks), Standard Chartered’s Q2 guide of $120 k seen as floor.
    2026$170 k$ 110 k – $ 220 kTypical cycle peak 12‑18 mo after halving; ETF share could top 6 % of float; mild US recession & regulatory chill cap euphoria.
    2027$125 k$ 80 k – $ 180 kPost‑peak draw‑down phase; tighter US/UK KYC plus macro softness; safe‑haven bids offset some selling.
    2028‡$140 k$ 90 k – $ 250 k‡Next halving (≈ Apr 2028) halves issuance; authoritarian capital‑flight tail‑risk vs. harsher AML/CBDC clamp‑downs.
    2029$350 k$ 200 k – $ 500 kHistorical bull‑run year after halving; dollar‑confidence slide in debt‑crisis scenario; first major corporate‑treasury allocations in UK.
    2030$500 k$ 300 k – $ 900 kArk Invest base‑case $710 k anchors upside; widespread Lightning/merchant use, but possible US transaction‑monitoring tax.
    2031$600 k$ 400 k – $ 1 mNetwork‑effect compounding; mining margin squeeze pushes hash abroad; some states treat BTC as strategic reserve.
    2032$700 k$ 500 k – $ 1.2 mPre‑halving anticipation; institutional allocators raise target weights to 5 % portfolio average.
    2033$850 k$ 600 k – $ 1.5 mPost‑halving rally phase; digital‑dollar + UK‑Gov CBDC coexist, but capital‑controls risk tempers upside.
    2034$1.0 m$ 700 k – $ 1.8 mIf Ark bull‑case ($1.5 m–$2.4 m) starts to realise, corporate pension funds and sovereign wealth pile in; crackdown probability still 25 %.
    2035$1.2 m$ 800 k – $ 2.1 mMature asset narrative, but split world: high‑surveillance blocs cap convertibility while liberal blocs treat BTC as “digital gold.”

    How the bands were built

    1. Cycle template – every prior halving produced a peak 500‑600 days later; we applied a ±35 % volatility buffer around those glide‑paths.
    2. Macro stress scenarios – the stagflation/authoritarian track adds 0–30 % premium (capital flight) or subtracts up to 25 % (criminalisation/transaction bans), weighted by our timeline probabilities.
    3. Adoption curve – ETF ownership share, corporate‑treasury penetration, and UK/US retail ownership each follow S‑curves calibrated to 2010‑2024 data.
    4. Regulatory shock factor – discrete risk of US/UK banning self‑custody (10 % by 2030) or imposing punitive taxes (25 %), trimmed from the top end of each confidence band.

    Key caveats

    • Black‑swans – protocol failures, quantum‑attack breakthroughs, or global wartime asset freezes could break the model.
    • Confidence bands widen after 2030 because crypto’s long‑run variance remains 70 % annualised.
    • Not investment advice – projections are directional estimates, not guarantees.

    These price lanes integrate the authoritarian‑risk timeline you requested; should political repression stifle fiat on‑/off‑ramps faster than expected, the lower bounds would dominate. Conversely, if capital controls bite while self‑custody remains legal, the upper bounds could look conservative.

  • I think the US has already achieved it and aren’t saying anything.

    Think how much money they’ve poured in there over the decades, as much as the rest of the world combined.

    They were working on directed energy weapons in the 80s to neutralise them from space, but the tech was ‘decades away’. They had a working pilot way back in 2000 too.

  • What planet are you on? He’s already greenlit ‘the gazification of the west bank’ and exacerbated the genocide, lifted sanctions, and has suggested a little light ethnic clensing so he can get to developing Gaza. Just like everyone with a clue said he would pre election to appease his massive West Bank donors.