atzanteol @ atzanteol @sh.itjust.works

Posts

7

Comments

4,076

Joined

2 yr. ago

On Saturday, Garcia said over text that she hoped to meet with the president, who she described as sympathetic to Cuban political refugees from Cuba and immigrants who came to the United States as children.

🤣🤣🤣 Oh my God...

"This is not what we voted for"

🤦‍♂️

It's exactly what he said he would do.

“Dissent,” he said, ”is the very essence of science.”

No, it's not. This is the bullshit quacks peddle to justify their unsupported crazy. It's part of their "they all laughed at Einstein" narrative.

It's also bloody expensive.

Tomasi was left sore but otherwise unharmed.

Considering you can spoof caller id this means you basically only need two phone numbers to potentially infiltrate the federal government.

We both got lots of good exercise in during the sponging because she kept doing the "it's gonna eat me dance" when I'd use the sponge

😂

I'm not even a fan of horses but I do love a good Sandy update. 🙂

Nobody thinks that.

ctrl+a and ctrl+e are from Emacs.

I once ran 'chown -R root:root /' in a misguided attempt to solve some permissions issues I was having. 0/10, do not recommend. It turns out a lot of system things aren't root owned...

Running a stupid command and learning from it is part of the learning process.

You got the basic idea from other posters, but there's also a lot of weird crap in there as well.

Basically you only need multiple IPs when dealing with services that only really operate on "well known ports". DNS and SMTP being the usual culprits. For most home users there this is no big deal - even if you wanted to host those services it's unlikely that you would need more than one ip to do so. HTTP solved this in '97 with HTTP/1.1 which allowed for host headers, which let's a single server host multiple sites.

This isn't something new that nginx solved. 😂

By "modern" do you mean "the late 90s"? HTTP 1.1 was adopted in '97 and allowed for the host header. NAT and port forwarding have been around since '94 - 2000ish.

Many services worked on any ports at the time as well. SMTP and DNS are probably the only ones that were (and remain) difficult to run on non-standard ports.

I guess that's "a lot simpler" than 6 lines of config?

You ever know two 8 year olds who were close friends and then got in a fight?

You're all caught up.

Kids seem to think host name based routing is "new'... It worked fine in the 2000s with Apache.

I'm at a point in my life where I don't justify my opinion based on ideologues on lemmy. Thanks for the concern though.

Your question doesn’t make any sense. Your original question was in response to someone saying they don’t call the cops in their house.

I took it to be a "In this house we obey the laws of physics" type expression. If not then I'm yet to be corrected by the original commenter.

That may be why you’re not getting “serious” answers, because you didn’t ask a serious question, even if you thought you did.

I mean... I did. Just none of them would actually say it or even provide an alternative. I'd happily accept an alternative if they could provide one. They love to say "don't call the cops" and it's utter bullshit. They apparently don't like having their bullshit exposed either.

sigh

Whatever. You're just arguing against the straw-man in your head. Have a nice day.

Given the ridiculous and insulting responses before this it's remarkable that you've somehow come up with the absolute stupidest response of the thread. Congrats I guess?

Also - you do know that despite the aweful response the cops did actually eventually kill the shooter right?

So.... Don't call the cops gets you... What exactly? Basically the same thing but the shooter is allowed to just continue without any resistance?

I'm being serious even though I know you aren't.