Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AS
Posts
6
Comments
109
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You're conflating liberal parliamentary representative democracy with all types of democracy - I was very specific in my post as to which I had the problem with (and it is equally as specific in the UK's new definition of "extremism").

    I have no problem with democracy and do think it's the best system. I have a problem with the idea that electing our overlords from a curated list with little to no fundamental difference (i.e. liberal parliamentary democracy) to then dictate to groups tens or hundreds of millions of people strong is democracy.

  • Just reading it - the constitution of Canada is mostly about land and parliament setup more than anything else (though Constitution Act, 1960 & 1965 are kick-ass).

    The rest is "unwritten" and "interpreted by courts" - exactly like the UK.

  • Germany, from my understanding, is a really different beast from most countries in how it works thanks to the East-West reunification.

    That said, it sounds similar to the US Supreme Court, is that right? What are the checks and balances on this court? What's to stop the bad actor work as seen in America?

  • I don't think the judges would like it, but what recourse would they have if the government passed an act such as this in Canada? I could see a judge saying this act breaches X treaties, but then just withdraw from the treaties (edit: which this act is likely a precursor to).

    The system of parliamentary liberal democracy is an inherently flawed system.

  • The idea that a government can instruct the courts to ignore human rights legislation shows how fundamentally broken the liberal "democracy" system is.

    This from the government that just made saying "I am intolerant towards the idea of liberal parliamentary democracy" an example of extremism but saying "foreigners don't deserve human rights" is not extremism.

  • Not entirely sure what you're saying, sorry if I got it wrong, but it seems like you're implying I said the opposite of what I actually posted.

    My point was there is no genetic predisposition to being bad at language learning but that the language education in the UK is woefully bad. I've spent more time learning how to learn Spanish than actually learning it because we're not taught the skill of language acquisition from childhood.

    The reason the government hasn't invested in language skills is because it's the lingua franca (the irony of that phrase isn't lost on me), but the argument of "weak aptitude for language learning" used in the article is patently false.

  • weak aptitude for language learning

    This is such bullshit. As a Brit abroad, our problem is weak language education. We are taught to such a poor degree and we are not taught how to learn a language. It's been the biggest struggle of my adult life trying to get conversational and after a year I am still way behind my cohorts - it's not some genetic predisposition to being bad at language learning, but a lack of language infrastructure in childhood.

  • My favourite "traditional" English meal is a good Steak and Kidney pie, made with an ale sauce. Seasoned with lots of pepper, Worcestershire sauce (anchovy sauce), onion and stock. Absolutely delicious.

  • Common myth, not true.

    First recorded recipe for Shepherds Pie is from a Scottish cookbook from 1849. First recorded use of Cottage Pie is 1791 by an English clergyman.

    Cottage Pie was used for both lamb and beef varieties until recently and was a way of eating leftover meats.

  • Coming back to this two months later. Really disagree with the comparison after reading Walkaway. It was more Ayn Rand in style than Le Guin. The characters were mouth pieces for ideologies, the story was half baked at best, and a lot of the nuance is entirely lost to "but look, they're the bad guys and it went wrong for them!"

    Not sure I'll try again. Thanks for the recommendation, but my search continues!

  • It's true, but at least half the artists I listen to I would never have found if it weren't for streaming. Something is, after all, better than nothing.

    And compared to the competition, Tidal's payments are good:

    ~30% more than Apple Music (0.01c)

    ~300% more than Spotify (0.003 - 0.005c)

    ~500% more than Soundcloud (0.0025c)

    ~1000% more than Pandora (0.00133c)

  • Been using tidal ever since Spotify's Joe Rogan debacle. Main reason? They actually pay the artist. But the sound quality is a nice bonus as well! No regrets...other than people trying to share music with me by sending a spotify link!