asap @ asap @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

264

Joined

2 yr. ago

I mean in your linked thread it says:

I have some 15K notes in Obsidian and it runs fine.

I personally have 4000+ notes in Obsidian and it runs fine 🤷

Here's also Obsidian with 100,000 notes and it performs fine. This test is also 2 years out of date.

Add in the local REST API as well if you want to easily interact with your notes programmatically:

https://github.com/coddingtonbear/obsidian-local-rest-api

They might be talking about posts like this (which I would love to have refuted, as this kind of info has so far kept me from using Docker significantly):

https://security.stackexchange.com/a/169649

Containers are isolated from the host by default.

Are you certain about that? My understanding is that Docker containers are literally just processes running on the host (ideally rootless), but with no isolation in the way that VMs are isolated from the host.

If you have some links for further reading it would be great, as I have been extremely cautious with my Docker usage so far.

I haven't found anything to refute this, but this post from 2017 states:

In 2017 alone, 434 linux kernel exploits were found, and as you have seen in this post, kernel exploits can be devastating for containerized environments. This is because containers share the same kernel as the host, thus trusting the built-in protection mechanisms alone isn’t sufficient.

If someone exploits a kernel bug inside a container, they exploited it on the host OS. If this exploit allows for code execution, it will be executed on the host OS, not inside the container.

If this exploit allows for arbitrary memory access, the attacker can change or read any data for any other container.

First of all, you can pay with crypto and use a burner email, but secondly, they don't link searches to your payment or sign in. (Assuming of course you take their word for it, but that's the same for every service that you do not host or compile yourself, and for which you've also read the entire source code yourself.)

I'm not saying people should use Kagi, I'm merely pointing out you can't claim it's "misleading and not private" without providing some sort of proof.

At best you can say you can't verify for yourself that they are indeed private as they claim.

So all of your internet searches are tied to one kagi account?

Kagi states in their privacy policy, "To ensure your privacy and security, we don’t monitor, log or store your queries or associate them with your account".

Of course you have to believe them, but that's the same for every service that you do not host or compile yourself, and for which you've read the entire source code yourself.

Kagi isn’t private and it is misleading to advertise it as such.

What is your reasoning for this statement?

Going directly from Kagi's own privacy policy, "To ensure your privacy and security, we don’t monitor, log or store your queries or associate them with your account".

Of course you have to believe them, but that's the same for every service that you do not host or compile yourself, and for which you've read the entire source code yourself.

If your sender sends an unencrypted message, yes Proton can see the plain text as would be expected. (Note, sending via TLS doesn't count as an encrypted email.) However according to their many audits their process is to immediately encrypt with zero-knowledge encryption in such a way that only you can access.

If you can't trust their published open source code and their multiple audits, then sure, you should look for alternate solutions.

mental outlaw video

For anyone else, it's this video. I'm 5 minutes in and it's talking about how SMTP isn't encrypted so Proton can read unencrypted email. Yeah, no shit...

Can we create a situation where brute force is unfeasible while using 6 digits PIN?

According to this comment from GrapheneOS, the latest Pixels and iPhones are not brute forceable with a 6+ digit PIN:

Pixel 6 and later or the latest iPhones are the only devices where a random 6 digit PIN can't be brute forced in practice due to the secure element.

Thanks for the paywall OP 🙄

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https://www.wired.com/story/priscila-queen-of-the-rideshare-mafia

In what way can Proton read any of your content?

It was for me. Been using Windows for 20 years, installed Aurora after all the MS craziness this year and haven't looked back.

In my case it's turned out to be a whole lot better - my laptop runs cooler, battery last about twice as long, and I no longer have any issues with going to sleep when I close the lid.

https://notesnook.com/

🙄 Sounds a lot like this classic example where residents complained about headaches, rashes, nausea, tinnitus, etc from a cell tower, only for it to be revealed that it was not powered up:

https://mybroadband.co.za/news/wireless/11099-massive-revelation-in-iburst-tower-battle.html

"Headaches, nausea, tinnitus, dry burning itchy skins, gastric imbalances and totally disrupted sleep patterns..."

At the meeting Van Zyl agreed to turn off the tower with immediate effect to assess whether the health problems described by some of the residents subsided. What Craigavon residents were unaware of is that the tower had already been switched off in early October – six weeks before the November meeting where residents confirmed the continued ailments they experienced.

WineDB says all their apps are "Garbage" status - eg does not run.

Rclone now works:

https://rclone.org/protondrive/

If you know Javascript you could very easily write a plugin in Obsidian to do this. Just have the plugin replace any markdown with the Unicode equivalent on save.

Great question though, it's actually making me wonder why this isn't a thing in normal plain text editors!

I installed Fedora as a dual boot 2 months ago, and I haven't once booted up Windows in that time. Everything just worked. Now that I feel a bit more confident I'm going to wipe the entire drive and try Fedora Atomic.

On mobile it is the most visible object on the screen, and very annoying: