Skip Navigation

Posts
8
Comments
340
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • yes, the government would never wield that power in a self serving way.

  • Jina App Drawer

    Lets you slide up from the home button to access your most used apps and search for all apps, from any screen.

    Much more efficient and lets me keep my homescreen clean.

  • "conspiracy theory"

    my brother, it is simple pattern recognition.

  • I'm not even in the Apple ecosystem and if I didn't care about gaming I'd grab one myself.

  • If you don't care about gaming, just get a macbook tbh.

    the new M1 ones are insane.

    if you want to game on it, I got a Lenovo Legion that I really like.

  • So how would a couple more limitations completely remove the right to own arms?

    it is an obvious slippery slope.

    there will never be a time in which people who seek to restrict the 2A will go:

    "ah, yes, this is enough limitations, we are done"

    that's why it's important to put your foot down and stop it in its tracks.

  • Anyone know the details of why it owes the SEC so much money?

  • I'm just talking about on the website, should have clarified.

  • how can I block lemmy from showing me 800 musk rage posts a day?

  • not if you have anything to say about it

  • The, ah, armorer he hired, knowing he was a total fuck up?

    is there any proof of this?

  • this is the correct take. there should be no expectation of actors to be responsible for their own safety around guns on set. That is literally the job of the armorer (who should be responsible), and depending on how negligent Baldwin was as the director for hiring her, Baldwin could also hold responsibility.

    Imagine if an actor was performing a stunt and the rope snapped and they died.

    Would people be talking about how he didn't practice correct rope safety?

  • how many times do you think about trump everyday?

  • stupid comment:

    • people who have different opinions that you are not "trolls" they just disagree with you
    • do you think pro 2A folks think that people that commit gun crimes shouldn't be punished?

    One thing they rightfully always bring up is that in many of these shootings, the existing laws weren't even being followed, yet they always spur cries for new laws that would only hurt law abiding citizens.

    I am going to ask you to actually consider the following situation. Let's say in the future hate speech is criminalized. If someone goes and says something very evil, would you support removing the first amendment rights of all citizens based on their actions?

  • lots of people still using it, unsure what you mean.