anus @ anus @lemmy.world

Posts

5

Comments

80

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think I'm on board with arguing against how LLMs are being owned and managed, so I don't really have much to say

Basically no. What you're calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You'll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all

What exactly is the argument?

I don't understand the nature of your question

1. Have you read the post?
2. If you'd like to refute the content on the grounds of another scientist, can you please provide a reference? I will read it

I don't think this answers the question

What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?

You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them

I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you're actually interested

This isn't my article and yes that's controlled for

I actually think that (presently) self hosted LLMs are much worse for hallucination

Do you hold Sam Altman's opinion higher than the reasoning here? In general or just on this particular take?

Thank you for your considered and articulate comment

What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not

Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?

Every time I see a comment like this I lost a little more faith in lemmy

No it doesn't

This is a fucking wild take

America/10

They have a few different products including plain water

Wow, TIL that the speed of sound has this equivalence

One of the cringest things in the whole wide supercluster

The idea that every left wing viewpoint is perfectly aligned with science and critical thought is over reaching

There are a lot of dumb takes here in the comments

Developer displacement works the same way it does for any other technology

The problem is not that the job is eliminated but that fewer are needed per unit of output

My startup only has 4 engineers because we don't need 5

This trend will continue until the SV hiring bubble bursts