anticolonialist @ anticolonialist @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

1,780

Joined

1 yr. ago

If Democrats want to go full Republican they deserve to lose. She is right, too many democrats want to win more than they want to end genocide. And this coming from the same people that claim to support marginalized communities.

Of course she is, their entire goal since Bill Clinton has to become the dominant party for conservatives.

We see the real Kamala Harris, Right wing authoritarian cop. This is who she's always been.

It wasnt me that authored legislation codifying woman's rights, it wasn't me as president promising to protect it by signing that legislation.

They knew it would eventually happen, that's why they kept promising to codify, and never did

Nice goal post you got there

It's Democrats pretending to be firefighters watching Republicans burn things while proclaiming someone should do something

There is an old saying, 'see something, say something.' Democrats saw something and their only thought was turning it into a fundraising opportunity.

She refused a vote while SHE was speaker. And if you remember correctly it was Bill Clinton that signed DOMA with Pelosi as House leader which restricted our marriages.

When the side that failed to prevent something had the power to prevent it, they are to equally to blame

That lesser evil that's grown enormous was a mistake wasn't it?

It's the ones claiming to be firefighters

The reality is the DNC is nothing but lip service

Several members of Congress thought a law was good enough, Obama thought it was good enough when he promised to sign the freedom of choice act on day one in office. Then 3 months later said it was no longer a legislative priority.

They used that two-ish week window to pass the ACA.

The ACA was passed in March 2010. Obama took office more than a year earlier. The bill to codify Roe was written in 2003, all that it needed was a vote, which Pelosi refused.

Your revisionist history is wrong.

I'm not the one that kept demanding Harris, as VP, is powerless against what Biden was doing. She's still not in that position of power and is acting on behalf of the President?

They had that text waiting to be sent for years. The story was hot off the press when I got mine begging for money

So what I'm hearing is if Democrats had codified it, Republicans would have come along and got it struck down. But to fix the problem we need to elect more Democrats to get it codified?

No one else sees the circular reasoning behind this?

Which one, the one that directly revoked women's rights or the one that did nothing to prevent it from happening?

We keep getting told that she's just the VP and has no power. Why would he then take a call from her?