Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AN
Posts
0
Comments
394
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • In nearly every European election since this year, the local Russia-controlled parties have taken over government (if they weren’t the government already, like in Hungary). This will continue next year, especially in the EU parliament. I wouldn’t hold my breath that any help will come from Europe any time soon.

  • Fusion 360 is amazing in the Getting Shit Donetm department, which is the weak point of FreeCAD. I have managed to steer through the byzantine UI of FreeCAD to create a CAD model, but it needed support by someone who has spent years in that application to get the more complex stuff, and even he didn't exactly know how to achieve it, and that's on top of me having participated in a 16 hour workshop on how to use FreeCAD. For Fusion 360, I've watched a few 5 minute videos on their official channel and that's it, everything else I was able to accomplish through just looking at the UI.

    I learned Fusion 360 before FreeCAD, so it's not just that I had prior experience in another similar tool.

    I think the basic problem with FreeCAD is that it's a collection of tool benches written by different people who don't talk to each other. They have overlapping responsibilities while still having vastly different feature sets and don't integrate with each other most of the time. So, if you want to create a model, you first have to plan ahead to understand what kind of features it's going to have, and based on that, you have to decide which collection of tool benches you have to pick. More than once I picked the wrong one in the start and then had to do everything all over again in the different one once I ran into a dead end.

    Fusion 360 feels like it was written by a single team with a single vision, and everything fits together.

  • They're still digital (a wire is either 0 or 1), which isn’t more useful for this than a regular CPU.

    What they do excel in is doing stuff in parallel, because there is no linear list of instructions, everything can happen at the same time (unless you specifically block something until a certain signal is sent).

  • Google did not extend XMPP. They let it sit there for a decade, not changing anything. They still only supported SSL 2.0 when servers started to require TLS 1.2 for S2S connections. They didn’t implement any extensions, some vital to the ecosystem back then.

  • The main problem is that there’s no business case. It does not provide value to the company to delete your data, so why would resources be allocated to it?

    The only solution is that the fines are higher than the costs for implementing a deletion process.