They posted the entire comment section this came from further down, and based on reading the exchange this was them saying that they would probably only date a pre-transition trans man if they were comfortable with him liking their boobs.
So I'm unsure what "way" you're implying they're thinking.
I'm more referring to the person that posted the comment, rather than the hypothetical partner. But yeah, I'm not saying that there aren't boundaries that you should have in relationships, or that you shouldn't break up with someone if they're harassing you, I'm mostly saying that the commenter's thought process reminds me of a closed-minded approach to relationships that I see pretty often.
I think there's something to be said here about negotiation in relationships, cause what you want doesn't necessarily line up with what your partner wants or is comfortable with. I see a lot of people talking like they would just avoid such relationships, but I'm not sure how possible that even is and I don't think it really reflects the reality of relationships.
The commenter was pointing out how they personally like boobs, and in the context of a relationship with a trans man who is dysphoric about that kind of thing it would make the relationship uncomfortable. They're not bringing up this example to insinuate that they would harrass a partner like this, they're bringing it up to say they wouldn't wanna do that. I don't think they're saying they think it's acceptable.
At least in the US, the bourgeoisie was successful in breaking working class consciousness and solidarity. Technically speaking, we could always protest and bring up arms against them, but without these things, not enough people recognize the truth about their oppression and work together against it. Though from what I've seen, things are starting to change.
oh no I'm not saying everyone who watches podcasters/streamers thinks this, I'm saying the specific type of person who would make this would think this. Especially from fans of stuff like the bad faith pod I'll hear them say that they like the show because it "doesn't have an agenda" when it obviously does. Similar type of stuff that you hear from breaking points or timcast fans
because people form parasocial connections with podcasters and come to believe that because they "don't like either side", "aren't established news", or are "more real" that they aren't spreading propoganda, even though they're literally opinion shows
desktop icons 🤢