Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AN
Posts
0
Comments
517
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I'm young enough to tell you that it's not just nostalgia. Most new tech now is like "cool but impractical" at best and "I'm worrying about how this will be used to make the world worse" at worst. Nothing to make me think it's the future.

  • Every other time I've encountered this argument, it's been an argument in favor of racism and xenophobia, often a Nazbol argument like "socialism only works if no diversity." It's my instinct to refuse it.

    But I couldn't deny that, American conservatives and liberals + leftists, on the mental level, live in different realities, with not only different core values and worries, but different ideas of what is actually happening (and no, I actively believe American leftists do not live in a fundamentally different reality from American liberals the way conservatives do from liberals + leftists.)

  • So many of the people who are most invested in federation are a contradiction in terms; centralized social media is evil and it's fucked up that it's the norm, but also anyone who isn't a cynical, crotchety Gen Xer with a tech degree doesn't belong on federated social media.

  • Yes, but that's keeping in mind that, contrary to popular belief among the types that go on Lemmy, most people aren't ideological. They don't care that Democrat A is this and Democrat B is that, they care about who they think will help their lives, ideology be damned. So, a lot of the people that socialists would call "libs" would vote for Bernie, BUT, most of those people think of Sanders primarily as "more liberal."

    People who are actively aware of the difference between neoliberalism and social democracy, I'm not sure. But I honestly think they're a rounding error in US politics.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • And before anyone says "America joined WWII late," I want to say that's a lie by omission most of the time. It's true that America put troops on the ground only after Pearl Harbor...but the US government was already sending supplies to the allies before that; for the entire duration of the war, the US had an anti-Nazi government. Hypocritically so due to the US policies against black people, but some people phrase it in a way that makes it sound like they want us to believe the US was close to joining the Axis before Pearl Harbor (also bringing up the MSG rally, which...you could find a comparable amount of Nazis in any Western country at the time.) Anti-interventionism was the absolute norm in the US at the time.

    Now, it is incorrect that US History class casts Americans as the primary heroes of WWII.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • US power comes from alliances with a bunch of other pretty damn powerful countries. If it does too much to strain Canadian, EU, UK, Japanese, South Korean, and Taiwanese relationships, US power goes away.

    Failure to continue to aid Ukraine weakens the value of US allyship to UK, EU, and Taiwan.

  • The problem is that the way we talk about dating has been dominated by people with a political agenda.

    Because 10 year olds have been talking about dating longer than red pill has been around. Not dead seriously, but they're not unaware.

  • "Sigma" sure, but saying "rizz" (etymology: short for charisma) is red pill is like saying talking about dating at all is red pill (and black Americans used it before Kai Cenat made it mainstream.)

    Do not use the Trump victory as an excuse for an unfettered fear and disdain of young people unless you wish for more news like it.