What is our guaranteed tear jerker movie or scene?
As Admiral Pat mentions, embeds are easy enough. I don't know how Tesseract does it, but a low-tech solution is to just replace 'watch' in the URL with 'embed' and stick it in a iframe. From Lemmy's GitHub, it looks like there's been work on this, but I'm not familiar enough with it to know whether it's for future versions that haven't been released yet.
New videos used to come in to Lemmy as expected. There's been some regression that stopped it. It's possible to bring them in manually though (by searching for the URL), and - like with embeds - it's possible that it's been fixed but not yet released.
PT's videos channels are ActivityPub Group types like Lemmy's communities, but it doesn't handle federation the same way. It does it in a way that's more compatible with Mastodon. Lemmy's communities Announce everything they receive (posts, comments, votes, etc) and so if you receive that Announce, then as long as you trust the community, you can trust that the contents haven't been changed and process it. PT's video channels only Announce new posts (so on Mastodon, it appears as if the channel has Boosted content by the channel owner), but for everything else, it's a combination of sending out a 'post update' (which is essentially an invitation to query the outboxes it provides for votes and comments), and just flinging out the comment as is, without the HTTP signature. If you get that comment, then you can either use the LD signature that Mastodon includes to verify, or you can look at the ID, and fetch it from it's source. As such, Lemmy's federation model is mostly Push-based, whereas PeerTube's is a bit of Push, and a lot more Pull.
It depends on what youtube is willing to provide. It seems more likely to provide a thumbnail if you use a youtu.be link than a youtube.com link.
Instances running Lemmy from 0.19.4 onwards (I think) provide the option of providing a separate thumbnail manually, which is useful, but your instance is on 0.19.3.
Removed
can you do it today?
Jump
There's a reply in that post from the mod. They locked it because it wasn't an open-ended question. I imagine that the rule is in place to prevent this community from being filled by DAE-type posts.
Yeah. ActivityPub has a type called 'Announce' that's used to make your followers aware of activity by another account. Mastodon uses it only for 'boosting' another user's content, but Lemmy's communities use it for everything ('Andrew has posted this comment', 'Andrew has Liked this post's, etc). Most of Lemmy's activities are ignored by Mastodon, but the Announce of a post or a comment is interpreted as a Boost.
It sort of works as a way to follow a community on Mastodon, but the individual boosting of all comments makes it annoying. I doubt anyone has set up a different account - you should be able to see the details of which actor is doing by clicking on it or hovering your mouse over it.
Anyway, speaking of jokes, have you heard how many MBIN users it takes to screw in a lightbulb?
Answer: 10. 1 to screw in the bulb, and 9 to tell you how great the software is. (I'm just kidding - there aren't 10 MBIN users, it just seems like there are because it evidently comes with a massive crowbar used to derail every thread to bollock on about it).
Luigi Mangione is the median American voter
They’re confused because they still believe the dominant divide in US politics is liberalism v conservatism. It’s not, and it hasn’t been for some time. Increasingly, even if they lack the exact language to explain it, voters do not identify foremost as Democrats or Republicans, progressives or traditionalists, or even left or right. They identify as pro-system or anti-system.
It's doesn't seem like feddit.online is aware of the other community (forumlibre@jlai.lu), so it doesn't have a copy of both posts, so it doesn't know that they are cross-posts.
If you bring that community into feddit.online, then create a post with the same URL as a recent post (e.g. https://files.catbox.moe/pebvir.jpeg), then they'll show up.
The picture (or whatever external resource a post is pointing to, like https://bbc.com/news/article.html)
The post you mentioned ('melting is tough') isn't picked up as a cross-post on PieFed instances because the dates are too far apart. A restriction that Rimu wanted was that they should only be detected if they were within 7 days of one another.
However, if you take that URL (https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/91f96cc8-a194-4cb8-abc6-505261e65420.jpeg), and make a new post with it, then the post you mentioned now shows that it has a cross-post.
A cross-post is just a post that links to the same URL as another post. The codeberg Issue that Blaze linked to mentions an exception, but other than that, there's not a convenient button that copy-pastes a post's title, body, and URL into a new 'Create Post' form. You can do it manually though, and everything that receives it will detect it as a cross-post, because everything is just looking for matching URLs.
Photon came up in this discussion amongst the Lemmy developers.
Maybe it was Neon Modem Overdrive, or this TUI app.
But, yeah - shell browsers like the ones you mentioned don't support JavaScript, so won't work with Lemmy (as it currently is - it might be different when they start using the leptos-based UI). There's places where they're not great with PieFed either (e.g. link2 -g can't deal with WEBP images), but it's completely theme-able, so a theme could easily be added by someone suitably invested to overwrite the existing HTML and provide a better experience.
If an admin bans a local user, they're banned once, but if they ban a remote user, the way Lemmy currently handles it is to ban them from every community they've subscribed to. There's an Issue about it because it's a hacky and incomplete solution. As such, the 'banned 20 times' thing isn't something that people should read too much into.
That link shows loads of apps I've never heard of, but visiting their repos suggests that they're dead.
Since that site helpfully breaks down platforms by programming language, it might be best to target something familiar (or maybe something you want to learn).
This community is hosted by Lemmy (Rust), and most of the posts and replies will be made by people using that, but they'll also be some by people using PieFed (python) or MBIN (PHP).
The 4K Blu-ray remux of Andor Season 1 is 230 GB. This new government might be shutting down the internet, but I doubt that they're monsters, and so surely wouldn't expect me to re-watch it in any lower quality. Fortunately, I've worked out that the Aldanhi arc and the last 2 episodes are 102 GB, so it should be manageable if some recaps are cut.
Is there a more modern alternative to embedding videos in plain HTML? It's easy to use them for embeds from youtube and peertube, streamable, etc.
Ah, I see now, thanks. That makes more sense than my previous theory, that MBIN users were pathological liars or something. Also, now my previous comment makes me look like an idiot. Oh, well.
It's interesting what MBIN does - making the user click a button gives it an extra chance to query the remote site, so it can render it correctly. That's not the same as taking the markdown and rendering it as HTML, but the end result is nice.
Elsewhere (like on PieFed), Youtube embedding works well because the URL is in a nice dedicated field, so it's easy to process, rather than parse through the text of a comment to find it. No idea what's happening with Tesseract, but it's just a front-end for Lemmy (albeit a sophisticated one), so my guess is that your link would fail, but since the comments aren't there, it's a bit moot.
I'd be surprised if that test worked on any platform in existence. You're using the markdown to render a static image, and sticking a youtube URL in there. PieFed supports it if the URL ends in something like .mp4, but that's only because Lemmy have fudged it, and so now people expect it. There's meant to be a 1:1 relationship between markdown and HTML, metadata transformed into metadata - nothing should have to look at the actual contents to know what tags to produce.
As for 'works for me embedded in mbin' ... eh? It looks like this in mbin:
That's literally just a external link to youtube. It 'works' because it doesn't - same as for the screenshot itself - instead of embedding it, it just coughs up the link to a remote site. Everything else is rendering it as it is - a broken link to an image that doesn't exist.
(maybe 'originallucifer' has some fancy app that takes a youtube shorts URL, works out the embed code, and then puts it in an iframe ... but like I say, I'd be surprised).
For the one rogue fuck, my Rogue One fuck would be:
A fair bit of Mastodon content doesn't fit well on Lemmy. One mundane technical reason is that their posts don't always split up well into the post title / post body that Lemmy expects. A cultural reason is that Mastodon users have a much higher tolerance for other users promoting things like their patreon than Lemmy users do. Even if the posts split well, and is content that Lemmy would like, bringing in the replies to it opens up a spam vector.
Lemmy let's you impersonate other users. I used to do that with https://lemmy.world/c/tails@lemmon.website, but stopped because the above-mentioned reasons made it tricky to automate (and because I got bored with it)
I cry quite easily, so a small sample of films that have made my eyes misty are:
The Remarkable Life of Ibelin
Bridge to Terabithia
A Monster Calls