andallthat @ andallthat @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

420

Joined

2 yr. ago

it's not just phones or devices that need updates, though. None of my refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers have ever lasted more than 10 years; I think the average is about 5 years before they stop working, get all rusty or a very expensive piece breaks so they are not worth repairing. Meanwhile all of my granma's old kitchen appliances are still working perfectly after 60+ years of service.

Sure, it might be just that over-optimizing their production so they are more performant while being cheaper to make is also making them less durable, but I don't see a lot of motivation from companies to go out of their way to build durable things either. And it's not that I think Corporate = Bad; as you say it's a cost/benefit thing, it's just that the "benefit" companies try to maximize is their shareholders', not our planet's. It's on Politics to create a legal framework where some of the cost to our planet is shared with companies (so they have incentives to make things durable/repairable again) and on us consumer to choose wisely what to buy, when and from whom.

This does seem to be the correct reason, at least statistically speaking!

To be fair he did climb the corporate ladder to the top already, so he doesn't need to go to the office any longer, no? Now let's hope he falls off that ladder

Thanks for the additional information. I wasn't in line to buy an iPhone 15 just yet; when I said "if it turns out it's more repairable" I mean if it stands the test of time I might consider an iPhone 17 or 18....

I was as surprised as you to see Apple mentioned as supporting the bill, in the article. Thanks for pointing me to Fairphone, seems amazing!

So far I've mostly seen iPhone 15 panned for lack of innovative features, but if it turns out that it's actually easier to repair (as Apple is saying) it would be a killer feature for me

I would be surprised if Whatsapp tried to implement its own version of Telegram's, Signal's and every other messaging app's protocol to "talk" to all of these other apps. I bet they will provide an API to interoperate with Whatsapp that these other clients may (or may not) choose to implement, in order to send their messages to Whatsapp users.

In that scenario it would up to Signal (if they implement this) to choose how to display to their users that they are sending a message to someone who's using Whatsapp, or to create options for users who want to disable this completely.

serious answer: it depends on your definition of "worse". There's some study linking smelling farts (and specifically the component that makes them rank) to health benefits: https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2014/jul/14/silent-not-deadly-how-farts-cure-diseases

there's an old joke about this:

man goes to doctor saying "I keep farting, doc; my farts aren't smelly and luckily they are also silent but I am worried because I fart all day long. Even now, as I was talking to you, I kept farting the whole time".

"I see", says the doctor. "I will prescribe you this pill, to be taken twice a day for a week".

"And will that help with the farting?"

"No, but it should help you with your sense of smell. Then come to see me after one week and we'll try to fix your hearing"

John the Baptist is considered a prophet also in Islam, so local variations of the name John are not so infrequent in Muslim countries, at least according to Wikipedia, see Yahya.

Hahaha I was like that boy too.

Girl:does he have interests? Is he passionate about something? Do I see ourselves spending quality time together?

Boy: I'm on a date, my shirt is clean, I have mints for my breath, I have gone for the romantic walk in the park, this time I've done it all perfectly! I'll get at least a kiss for sure!

I agree with this, OP. After some time has passed, it's also pretty likely that the other person has just moved on anyway and that they also would want to avoid the awkwardness of that diacussion

Ah yes it's that pre-emptive awkwardness of nearing the end of a date, knowing that (although nothing in particular went spectacularly wrong) you don't really want to have more and trying to signal this to the other person.

I've been on the receiving end of that too and now, many years later and away from the dating game, I can retroactively see it and accept it for what it was but man, it would have stung back then to hear it in plain and simple words. Being ghosted seemed like a better option to me too in retrospect. Kudos to you for being mature enough to handle that conversation!

I agree with you, and that's what I choose to think when I feel like the "best" version of me.

But there are moments (or a part of me) that has a way more violent disposition and feels differently about people who do terrible thing.

I'm a very calm person and not at all violent so please don't report me to the police on the base of these posts... That violent part of me is small and weak, but I just think it's important to acknowledge it because it's also the part that makes me recognize that a rapist or a murderer is a person like me and that it might be me, with the wrong set of circumstances, life choices and frame of mind.

He mentions rapists and murderers. I choose to think that they don't deserve to be given a gruesome death (or a death sentence at all for that matter) but I'd be lying if I said I have never felt that way when reading about some f-ed up stuff on the news. Maybe I'm also higher on the Hitler scale than I thought I was.

Shit, I'm sorry, it was insensitive of me to make that joke (well, half-joke)

Well, they probably didn't do it very scientifically but if they could think of it and the tools existed, someone in history is likely to have tried it as a method for killing people.

Impaled people, for instance, could allegedly take days to die. Being slowly eaten by ants or rats sounds pretty painful too

There's one called "life" that is pretty cruel too. It might take anywhere from seconds to more than a hundred years for it to eventually kill you and some.people get to experience a lot of pain throughout the experience.

Well in terms of certainty of flying, RyanAir is not worse than other companies. If anything they are a bit better, as I don't think they overbook flights like other companies do and (by generally flying to secondary airports) they tend to be less affected by delays/congestion. I wish you good luck with your flight!

RyanAir is (in)famous for this type of shit. E-tickets are used everywhere, but RyanAir forces you to have your ticket printed on paper or on their own mobile app. If you don't, you'll pay 20+ Euros for the employee at the check-in to print it for you. I think these ludicrous fees are meant more as "fines" than revenue.

Whether you like RyanAir or not (and I don't like them much), they are good at keeping their prices low by cramming as many people as they can on each flight as quickly as possible. This means disincentivizing anything that can waste them a few seconds per passenger, be it additional baggage (the base ticket now has no baggage at all, except for a small bag or backpack that can be placed under the seat) or, I guess, checking someone's identity at check-in.

haha, could be! Basically the Chinese version of "why u hitting yourself?"