I make a point of (very obviously) laughing hysterically at any cybertruck I pass. Since the only reason to buy one is an ego-stroke of the tiniest genitals on the planet, ridicule is the only thing I can think of to affect them.
It makes me feel better, at least. I hope others start doing the same.
You can't argue facts with the party of feelings. They claim to be strong but they're so terrified of losing their positions of power (socially, politically, etc.) that they have no choice but to deny the truth. They've turned the truth political. (The recent pathetic (predominantly social media) responses to the 60 minutes opening about his cabinet picks is an excellent example of this.)
I've seen some folks say it could be a result of steroid abuse, and I didn't care enough to research whether it was true. If he did abuse steroids, his supremely shrunken raisins could help explain the cybertruck.
And not quite as perky. His chest bump is essentially in the middle of his torso. Makes me think of the 1990s polygonal Lara Croft every time I see it.
The article is okay but I'm struggling with the author's conflation of misanthropy and misandry. Both are mentioned, but only one applies. It could be that the author made a typo, but the tone of the article to me suggests otherwise.
Hey, hey, since we have sharknados, it's important to specify what kind of hurricane we have. Could've been a furricane - much more damaging to Trump and his ilk.
Not sure if you're joking, so wanted to clarify, just in case - It's not that I "saw the light"; I was never in the dark and am not a conspiracy theorist. My initial comment was meant to not be taken seriously.
Cannon has shown herself to be inept enough in her position before; I could see her 'accidentally' messing up and needing a mistrial.
Or could take it even crazier and have him go to prison and quietly squirrel him away somewhere under a new name. (Even better if he were to "die" in some method where his remains wouldn't be pristine so as to make it easier to falsify its identity.)
Ugh. Typing that made me feel like I'm making arguments to treat this seriously; feels gross. I don't understand how people can genuinely believe conspiracy theories; if you pull at any one of the loose threads, the whole theory falls apart. My 5% has decreased. 😂
(Don't take this seriously. Or do; I'm not sure it would make a difference in all the insanity in the world.)
The conspiracy theorist in me says he'll disappear into the woodwork and, effectively, go free because it was a false flag.
My 'reasoning':
Trump wasn't in the guy's line of sight.
The guy didn't shoot.
When it happened, wasn't Trump having some struggles with his publicity? I forget the details, but I wanna say he wasn't getting as much attention at the time.
Trump didn't get much lasting attention from the first attempt, and it certainly didn't cause the country to rally against around him. Why not stage a second one to gain sympathy?
Again, I'm only maybe 5% serious here but, if the other side gets to have their insane conspiracies, I think it's okay for me to have this one.
Edit to correct me using the opposite word I meant.
You are missing literally all of the context. WaPo has endorsed in every presidential election since 1988. Suddenly, weeks before an incredibly contentious election, and right around the time Bezos-owned businesses met with Trump, this Bezos-owned publication decides to "return" to its "roots" (after three and a half decades). Even if it's not actually sinister (debatable, but we may never know), the appearance of impropriety is a serious issue and damages WaPo's credibility.
What's terrible is that it's the right hand that keeps covering us with shit while those of us on the left hand try desperately to get the soap. Not enough soap for all the shit. :(
She looks excellent with her pink highlights. What a cutie!