Oracle Linux (up until 9.3 I think?) is a direct clone of RHEL. After 9.3 (or maybe it's 9.2) it's a best attempt clone of RHEL (similar to Alma Linux or Rocky Linux).
If you want to learn RHEL then it's a fairly decent equivalent with a couple of their own quirks thrown in (ULN, ksplice and the UEK).
Also, I don't bother with certs or care if people have them. I have yet to find someone who knows a product better having got the cert than someone who's used the product without a cert.
The reasoning stated is that EROFS is more actively developed than SquashFS. Does that mean that SquashFS is feature incomplete, or that it's more stable?
Isn't that the purpose though of Ubuntu though? They made it easy, everything is open source, and then people/companies/orgs that want to do things different can just fork it and do their own thing. If they make a better product according to even 1 person, great. Job done. Plenty of people are happy with vanilla Ubuntu.
I don't even use Ubuntu but I sure appreciate the amount of work they've done over the years and I feel they get a lot of stick about it for no good reason.
That's really interestng. I assume it's the left photo from above and the right photo from below.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynandromorphism
Genuinely an interesting mutation, it's weird that it's listed as happening in Rodents but not other mammals? Is that just a numbers thing I wonder?