i find ai is not the best at understanding actual creativity. It has a tendency to see the unusual part of what you are saying and think "that's abnormal, surely that's not what is meant, i better do the normal way". I find in SD1.5, since it's old, it at least SEEMS creative because of the chaos. But I often go to SDXL or SD3.5 with an extracreative idea I want to be really specifically done perfectly and, instead, it makes a 'perfect' image not of what my idea was but of the nearest human commoner concept a noncreative boring person with no creativity would have. As ai modernizes, it seems better at images that don't think outside the box, and converts prompts outside the box to being within.
Also I hope my current view is incorrect and I HEAR midjourney (which i haven't used) is good at prompt specificity
This in the examples amazes me. My own prompts barely are anything yet in comparison.
Also I am amazed by the naturalness of people with wings, tails, dogs, etc. Like how did ai learn her wings should do this when making this expression?
it is video-01 from that using images generated from my image generator. I BELIEVE it is supersecret china juice and not opensource in the slightest. Could be wrong of course.
the original image was exceptionally bad quality also, which may have affected that ~i just liked the locations of the people and totally thought 'musical dance number'
