aidan @ aidan @lemmy.world

Posts

21

Comments

1,970

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

there is no purpose other than legacy of having replaced other commands

terraform(really is just a injection of a file() into a shell script)

I don't think I did(though sometimes I do accidentally because of the Jeroba app UX)

A McDonalds employees named Bob tweeting something, and then Alice agreeing with it does not make Alice a McDonalds agent. It means she agreed with what Bob tweeted, even if he was being subversive/malicious

No, because neither of those are the inputs. The input was the systemd file in the image. The whole command was not printed in the error, only surrounding context. The single-quote was indicating the ending of that context(because it was the end of the line) printed by the error.

The same thing was done with )' on the first line of error

I don't disagree, but this time its my fault

Sadly no, its injected with terraform templatefile, I already looked for a normal way to autoescape it, but from a brief look I couldn't find one. I know there is a replace function that can take regex(RE2, which from my understanding prohibits * in lookbehinds)- but the simplest regex I could think of at nearly 6am for capturing only non-escaped quotes is /(?:^|[^\\])(?:(?:\\\\)+|[^\\]|^)(?'quote'")/gm. Though, I just realized if the quotes are escaped I would want to double escape them, so actually replacing all quotes with escaped quotes should be fine, also another limitation of this method is lines can't have trailing \

To avoid having it hosted separately its injected into a shell script as a string

dsygraphia, I meant to say escape the quotes(you can see that because the comment wasn't about comments but was instead about quotes)

The same is true for JVM bytecode, and C operations really are just aliases for ASM operations, and ASM (sometimes) is just aliases for microcode operations

No I meant, what was the grant process? As in, just applying for it, or selected for it?

Did you just apply for it?

Not rare, they've been trying to block encryption for a while unfortunately

It means it was a joke

Okay so you're just trolling, sorry not going to engage. Hope your week gets better so you don't feel like this is a good use of your time. Bye

What do you mean?

I think it’s like the distinction between art and obscenity

I agree in that its an inherently individual decision.

If it were, I’d largely trust UK courts to get it right (they are by-and-large capable of this, and much less politicised than their US counterparts).

What makes you think this?

I don't think this was right

Nor this

Nor this

What am I supposed to say "no you insulting and attacking me isn't true". Like Chomsky said "The person who throws the mud always wins. Because there's no way of responding to such charges." All I said is the way I read it they're saying "if this is true" which is inherently questioning it. That may not be what they meant, I can't read their mind. But yes go ahead and insult me, there's not point in me denying it and you know that, that's why you said the insult.