Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
29
Comments
301
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Now imagine being a freelance developer, who works for more than two clients, using Teams with different email addresses.

    It's a horror!

  • Regarding the SMB-share, let my try to clarify. Let's say you have 3 machines. 192.168.1.10/20/30. On machine 10 a folder synology which has a network folder mounted onto it from machine 20 mount -t nfs 192.168.1.20:/some/folder synology.

    Now you want to access that folder on machine 30. Here you can't use mount -t nfs but MUST use mount -t cifs instead, because you cannot forward a mounted share. However, this is not the problem, it's just a description of my current setup.

    Regarding the ownership. Your point is very valid, but I ruled that out already. I did a so-called bind-mount within Synology with the exact user permissions as in the users home folder, but this didn't work. FYI: a bind-mount is where you have two folders /foo (with many sub-folders and files) and /bar (empty). If you do mount --bind /foo /bar, then the system thinks that bar is a real folder with the subfolders and files (from foo, including their permissions).

  • I've heard about it, but I'm good on lemmy. Thx.

  • and yet, it somehow made it into a kids game. The core issue here is the uncontrolled content display. Imagine some NSFW ads slip through into a kids app. Therefore, ads must be forbidden in apps intended for underaged.

  • I use it myself, but somehow all the recommendations are just boring right now.

    It mostly shows things that I've already watched, or things from months or even years ago.

    Rarely new and trending stuff shows up.

  • If you find something, can you share it with us?

  • you're right... I'm already evaluating it now.

  • Just came across xpenology and surprisingly I managed to set it up without a hassle. I think this is my final solution I'll be going with.

    The thing that amazed me the most. I could import my GoogleDrive files and it converted them so they work in synology office... Mindblowing!

  • I tried that... although I had some issues setting it up.

    What's funny, I thought this would be the hacky solution, while xpenology being the real deal.

  • Sorry, due to a typo, there's some confusion. I do run proxmox bare-metal, with 2 VMs: Fedora, xpenology.

  • Maybe my comment might be a bit misunderstanding, but I do run my Fedora VM within proxmox too. So, I have two VMs, Fedora and Xpenology.

    I was just wondering whether the additional VM makes even sense to have it running alongside XP.

  • I'd really prefer to avoid NextCloud, since it was very slow, in comparison to Synology, on the same hardware.

    But thx for the hint abaout casaos. Didn't know about that. Will definitely have a look at it.

  • even if that was true, the other side could just stop hitting the shield all the time and do precise targeting.

  • I'd highly recommend to take a deeper look into Docker. While it might look complicated at first, it really isn't. Once you get the gist of it, you'r setup life will me much simpler in the future.

    In a nutshell: Say you need to run jellyfin (or whatever)

    Generally, you'd need to install jellyfin from the repos or download it's binary, etc... Then you'd have to dig through the configuration process, where files are scattered all across the system. Probably, in some cases, you'd have to copy/move/symlink media files around, etc.

    With Docker however, you just spin up the jellyfin as a container, and bind the necessery configuration and media files to that container, which is usually a one-liner.

    So instead of having scattered config files all around the place, you can have something like ~/Docker/configs/jellyfinn and bind that folder (or file) to the containers /etc/jellyfin. And you can use the same approach to have your media files in ~/Movies and bind thst to jellyfin /data folder. These are just examples, you'll just have to look where the docker containers expect the files to be, which is usually well documented.

    And the final step is to bind the ports of the container to the host, so you can interact with the service as if it was running on the host.

  • Exactly, that's what I'm talking about.

    Obviously, with the fact that the Palestinians have been opressed for decades, which led for organisations like the Hamas to arrise, there's no good guys / bad guys in this situation.

  • This might be the best eli5 of good journalism.

  • But haven't they oppressed the Palestinians for the past decades. Didn't they evidently commit crimes that fall under the umbrella of "terror"?

    At some point, it's unavoidable for organisations to arise, that don't play by the rules anymore.