absGeekNZ @ absGeekNZ @lemmy.nz

Posts

79

Comments

1,371

Joined

2 yr. ago

There are places in the world that don't have the death penalty...just sayin

I'm doing my part

Most of the time, probably not. The problem occurs when there is a breach of the standard.

In that situation NZFS should have all of the decision making power, MPI should be required to step back and let evidence guide the decisions.

Just came here to say this.

The suggested videos are terrible.

This has the same vibe as

I think the main problem here is that the NAFS is part of MPI. As stated in the article:

[NZFS] should not be within the same organisation that is charged with promoting New Zealand's primary producing export market. It doesn't make any sense to be nested in there.

They could have a synergistic relationship; but if there is a breach...MPI will err on the side of more exports, where NZFS should err on the side of safety and food system integrity.

Pastor of muppets

I only use Reddit when it comes up in a search result. Otherwise it is Lemmy all the way

Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

Bullshit, some things happen on day one!!! Like the ending of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

If it makes you feel better.

I know nothing about you, but that is enough to make me hate everything about you and what you stand for.

Unless of course we can find a common enemy.

I would assume that it would be something like 24TB/day [5k officers (2 shifts of 12 hrs) * 2GB/hr]; this would be for 365 days a year.

So yearly it is more like 8760TB for a years worth of data.

Cheapest I could find was Mega.nz at 16TB for $47.5/month which equates to ~$312k; this would be totally doable.

The processing requirements would be huge but a solvable issue also. Even if we double the data to 10k officers 24 hrs/day it is still under $650k/yr

Retention of data should be determined by importance, one problem is we don't know what will be important until it is needed.

Who determines what is important enough to keep?
If it is done by "AI" what are the rules?

If we assume 2/3 of the 15k police staff are "front line" i.e. those wearing body cams; that is roughly 10k cams recording 24/7. Each camera records @1-2GB/hr; this comes to 24-48TB/day of data; even if we mark 80% of that data for immediate deletion because nothing is happening (done by AI). We are talking 5-10TB/day that will need to be reviewed to determine if it is important enough to keep long term.

That is a lot of work; and a lot of resources to review the data. The storage quickly adds up; the benefits are huge, but the challenges of storage/security/privacy are equally enormous.

came into effect on 1 April

....seems foolish

We tried a lot of techniques....

Rigid schedules, no schedules , big feeds, lots of little feeds...nothing seemed to work. For one kid, he wouldn't sleep unless he was next to one of us; one of the others wanted to be in the same room but not the same bed....

But once they hit ~3 it was like a switch flipped, and now they all sleep with no issues.

You sound like my brother after his first, who was a saint of a child.....the second however.....great kid but "not a sleeper" as they say.

None of my kids slept through until they were 3....10 years of broken sleep

Just a note infant <> aborted....these were likely babies born and died of disease and preventable causes.

So much to hate about this situation; but I don't think abortion debate is relevant here.

It is sad that this still works. We need to educate the public on this kind of shit.

• Step 1: Under fund the public sector
• Step 2: Point out how "bad it is"
• Step 3: Say look "the government can't run things well"
• Step 4: Pay the private sector to do the job; at a higher rate than the public sector.
• Step 5: Cry that there is not enough money. Go to step 1.

They are probably testing for the metabolites rather than the drug itself

It depends on the distance to object. Also the distance between the object and something to compare it to.