abbotsbury @ abbotsbury @lemmy.world

Posts

78

Comments

536

Joined

2 yr. ago

I don't know how that's a response to me but thanks for the funny clip

What you did was typical pro-CCP misdirection

Idk, I didn't feel like they were pushing an agenda, can't say the same about you.

There are no far left politicians in America

People often mean "white" when they say Western

Collecting evidence after a crime is the opposite of Minority Report.

In the Court of the Crimson King whips so much ass brother

time is a flat circle and we're all rad

ehh, I think it makes sense in that it eliminates perverse incentives like "give us 50 cents more and you can double your already extra large soda," but as implemented it was certainly just a lazy band-aid solution

Often times, whether or not people should be destroyed does not hinge on if they agree with you.

If any sugar soaked beverage is allowed to be marketed as a health drink, that's a problem that applies to the entire industry.

And drinking 90oz is the fault of the consumer, remember how much blowback there was when New York banned selling drinks above a certain volume? The people want to be able to do drink ungodly amounts of soft drink, apparently.

Only thing I really blame Panera for is not clearly labeling how much caffeine is in a cup, which I also don't really blame them for because the last time I went to Starbucks or McDonald's I couldn't find out which latte had the most caffeine, so that's standard behavior I guess.

Push for more required disclosure if you'd like, I'd probably agree, but Panera was not out of line IMO.

Also hate seeing the stoner talk about how much safer blazed driving is than drunk driving.

It's not so caffeinated, it's about as much caffeine per ounce as coffee

I mean, if it's between people who didn't volunteer and people who did, I would have to say it should be the volunteers (US military)

baby you can cry about tone policing all you want, but you are being extremely abrasive which is why people don't want to talk to you.

You're not being tone policed, you think you can just act like an asshole if you have a good enough reason.

I met a friend in a chat room that was schizophrenic and loved Anal Cunt

the phrasing didn’t indicate that

the phrasing certainly didn't indicate that they wish for the abolition of the GOP, you came up with that on your own

"should not be allowed” which implies prohibition.

you're thinking of "shouldn't be able" bud, at the end of an election there can only be one party allowed into office

A political party which should not be allowed into office, is what?

the loser, the statement was encouraging a voting position

"everyone I disagree with is trolling"

honey you are seriously reaching if you choose to interpret "should not be allowed into office" as "we must abolish them"

should not vs shall not, ironic telling someone else to practice reading comprehension

precedent of being able to abolish the competing party

Nobody said that, quit arguing with things in your head honey

says it all