Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WI
Posts
1
Comments
160
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Flexing that sci-fi knowledge real hard, my dude.

    The AI that you're describing probably won't even be possible (if it even is possible. We don't even fully understand human intelligence/brains yet) until quantum computing is ubiquitous so your whole argument is illogical.

    For my own silly sci-fi take, I believe our brains are probably closer to quantum computing than traditional computing.

  • Not sure what you mean. Reddit is like ignorant liberal mecca. So many corporate dem supporters there that would much rather engage in (an endless void of culture war nonsense) gender politics than class politics. The liberals that don't even realize they're right of center and that being offended for someone doesn't make them a progressive or a leftist (or even a good person). They also love the aid to Ukraine. Clownshow.

    Edit: looks like lemmy.world is next in line to be ignorant liberal mecca.

  • introduce a foreign strawman into the equation and have a culture war.

    Trans/gender politics are a perfect example of this. Nothing riles up liberals like a minority being oppressed, and nothing riles up conservatives more than minorities having rights.

    Same with abortion and almost anything relating to Christianity in government.

    Racism etc etc

    Put it all together and baby you got a culture war stew goin'! The American way!

  • 99% of what I see regarding this topic is either straight up war propaganda or people who are unabashedly unafraid to let others know that they are totally ignorant of post WW2 geo politics.

    Anything other than "DAE just love Ukraine and that charismatic Zelensky! 😍😍" gets down voted to oblivion. Its classic Red Scare 1980's bullshit lol. Even now I'm sure most who read this are scrambling for the down vote button because they think I'm some sort of Russian shill/supporter simply based off the fact that I'm not fellating the West's efforts.

  • Do you think fascists support free speech?

    In function they certainly do when they are spreading their message to gain the power to tear it down. It's not about supporting it. It's about using liberals' own tool against them to take power from them and then never let them have any back.

    Edit: holy frick you're wintermute I thought you were gone from the Fediverse for good...dangit!

    ???

  • It is the inevitable consequence of letting current humans have 100% free speech.

    We need to stop tolerating the intolerant. The intolerant have just as much right to their message as the tolerant, which when you think about it is disgusting. As long as they don't literally call for a specific person or group of people's death they are totally within their rights to spread their bullshit. And it's not a situation where it becomes a "marketplace of ideas" and the most popular idea wins out. The intolerant will slowly bend government to their will to destroy the free speech they rode in on and put the tolerant against the wall as soon as politically possible.

    Stop tolerating the intolerant.

  • Let's do domestic violence next! You can learn all sorts of new things about men today.

    "1 in 4 women and 1 in 9 men experience severe intimate partner physical violence, intimate partner contact sexual violence, and/or intimate partner stalking with impacts such as injury, fearfulness, post-traumatic stress disorder, use of victim services, contraction of sexually transmitted diseases, etc.

    1 in 3 women and 1 in 4 men have experienced some form of physical violence by an intimate partner. This includes a range of behaviors (e.g. slapping, shoving, pushing) and in some cases might not be considered "domestic violence." 1 1 in 7 women and 1 in 25 men have been injured by an intimate partner.

    1 in 10 women have been raped by an intimate partner. Data is unavailable on male victims.1 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men have been victims of severe physical violence (e.g. beating, burning, strangling) by an intimate partner in their lifetime.

    1 in 7 women and 1 in 18 men have been stalked by an intimate partner during their lifetime to the point in which they felt very fearful or believed that they or someone close to them would be harmed or killed"

    https://ncadv.org/STATISTICS

    Crazy how women are the ones being abused more! I would have thought, based on an argument I heard about not feeding into stereotypes, that it would have been more evenly distributed /s

    I guess men are just statistically much more likely the aggressor in the majority of sexual/domestic violence.

    Who knew?

  • "Over half of women and almost 1 in 3 men have experienced sexual violence involving physical contact during their lifetimes. One in 4 women and about 1 in 26 men have experienced completed or attempted rape. About 1 in 9 men were made to penetrate someone during his lifetime. Additionally, 1 in 3 women and about 1 in 9 men experienced sexual harassment in a public place."

    https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html

    But yeah, I bet it's women sexually assaulting other women and surely not the other way around. /s

    You're the problem.

  • The vast majority would not, and have not.

    Science says the opposite, that the majority does and has.

    I know you won't, but go check out some sexual assault/rape statistics. Your tiny incel brain will be shocked to find that you are totally wrong.

  • Nah, it's all rape. We know for a fact, statistically, that men are the rapists by an overwhelming majority. When women are responsible for 90+% of sexual violence then we can say women are the problem. Until then, men are the problem. Because we have this data and it isn't incorrect or interpreted incorrectly. Stop covering for the rapists, bro.