_cryptagion [he/him] @ _cryptagion @lemmy.dbzer0.com

the only way to get into whatever version of heaven you believe in is to ki

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

1,204

Joined

9 mo. ago

I'm all for anything that makes Israelis furious, and am absolutely delighted that the Trump admin is so stupid they exposed an Israeli spy to danger.

He's not a nazi sympathizer, stop being ridiculous. And he has never once said he would give your data to the US government, Trump admin or not. You're just straight up lying.

You and everyone like you are overly dramatic, terminally online chronic posters, making mountains out of molehills because you thrive on controversy and need something new each week to be outraged about.

Oh shit yeah I’m gonna have to boot it up again

To "work the canal"? Does this idiot think they row the boats through it or something?

That’s childish, petulant nonsense, especially since that would be illegal under Swiss law, even if this law is amended. Not to mention, it isn’t Andy Yen who gets to decide that anyway. It’s the board of directors, of which Tim motherfucking Berners-Lee is a member. You know, father of the World Wide Web.

How the mighty have fallen.

Ah, I should have guessed that from the quotes, huh? That was my bad.

So your position is that they did something you didn't like a decade ago, and so that makes them untrustworthy now?

At least you've admitted that your argument is nothing more than an opinion.

That's very good advice. The article you links specifically says "Allegedly" in the title. Let me save you the hassle of getting a dictionary and explain to you the definition of "allegedly":

used when something is said to be true but has not been proved [source]

The article not only does not provide proof, but it admits that it does not provide it. You, however, continue to insist it does because you want it to be true.

Then you didn't read it very good, if you not only missed the fact the article was alleging Proton was hacked by Israel, as well as believe it provides proof of that claim when it does not.

No, the post is a conspiracy theory that gives no evidence to support the claim. You can't use an allegation as evidence to support your allegation, that's circular logic.

Now the "Switzerland" based privacy firm is proxied by an Israeli firm for traffic analysis, network exploitation of users, cryptographic monkeying

It literally claims that the traffic was routed expressly for the purpose. You didn't read the article.

It should be noted everywhere that this person posts this, that this is an allegation without any actual evidence to support it.

No, you provided a conspiracy theory that fit your explicit biases. If you had bothered to actually read the link you provided, you would know they didn't provide any evidence to support their claim that Israel is hacking Proton.

If this is as bad as the scandals with Proton ever get, I'll be quite happy.

That didn't answer the question. You made an assertion, but haven't provided any evidence to support that claim.

The irony of saying something like that when you're using an ISP with Trump supporters on the board of directors is wild.

Cryptostorm. Supports port forwarding, and you can buy access tokens through third parties using crypto. You do not register an account or provide them with any information to use the service, other than the token.

But honestly, Proton is the best route to go.

It would be more accurate to say some people are moving away. The majority of their users are quite happy where they are.

Then don’t do that? You have your choice of servers.