It'll likely go away with an update. But you can always check xsession log, dmesg, etc to see if there's a hint on why the screen locking process is crashing.
Obviously we have only testimonies of that from officers and volunteers and confirmation from Israeli authorities,
No, we have the testimony of one IDF member who promoted Palestinian genocide in the past. Everybody else who was on the scene and gave a statement could not confirm that onetestimony lie. All the newspapers back-paddled on that story; maybe you should too.
What is there to benefit from faking such document? Is it not obvious that Hamas targeted civilians and children?
Yes. Children are civilians. The repeated claim is that children were not targeted as part of the populace but specifically. In the eyes of most people that would be even more sinister. And Israel needs Hamas and the Palestinians who supported them to look as bad as possible to distract from their retaliation.
even if these documents are genuine and prove that Hamas explicitly wanted to target children, it's still a big media conspiracy to make Hamas look worse than they are?
No. But I don't see that from those pictures. They targeted a residential area, which happened to contain a school (big surprise). Like with the "beheaded babies", extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. From the provided information I'm not convinced that Hamas targeted children specifically.
Targeting civilians is already bad. The way I suggest they spin a story is by setting the focus on children, babies, women, ... to appeal to emotions rather than just reporting facts. And I think they do that to dehumanize Hamas and by extension Palestinians to justify the retaliatory atrocities of an even bigger magnitude in the eyes of the world.
It's really not that hard of a concept to grasp ... remember the babies taken out of the incubators in Iraq?
Have you ever heard of propaganda and dehumanization? Have you also noticed how Israel has already killed at least three times more civilians in the past few days?
Hamas targeted residential district ...
Hamas target school in ... to kill children!!!
Spot the difference. What feels more like honest reporting and why would one choose the other option?
Fake evidence to spin a narrative??? We have all seen the result of these plans
We have have seen the result of some plan. I'm questioning whether it is 1) the plan that was depicted here and 2) even if it was whether the reporting on its content is accurate.
I like that you also moved to goal posts ...
Not really.
... since you clearly couldn’t stomach your own shit take on how the plans must be false flag plants, ...
Um, no. You do not seem to understand what false flag means, and nowhere did I suggest any false flag operation.
... but my favorite part was when you felt able to say that even if they were genuine, that SIMPLY REPORTING IT would be an intelligence attack on Hamas/palestine.
I did not say anything even remotely like that.
Like are you fucking kidding me??? Shall they only report on things that look good for Hamas?
They should report stuff they have fact checked and not transform 'the general populace' into 'babies, kids, women, cripples, ...'. The entire point/concept of terror is hitting soft targets. Reporting only on the 'very weak' caters to emotions, not transport of information. And why would they do that ...
I'm not even sure what you're trying to talk about here. Regional settings? Look, devices have serial numbers. Manufacturers keep track of where devices are sold to. It does not matter what route a device takes, only who pays for it. The number of devices in Gaza paid for by Israel is going to be very small. If a non profit in Germany buys a printer for a hospital in Gaza, that device will go through Israel before ending up in the hands of Hamas, and that device might or might not have Israel regional settings, that does not magically make Israel the buyer and does not alter the manufacturers or traders records who the device was sold to. It's really not that hard to understand, is it?
I'm not sure if you're playing dumb here. What I'm saying is, that this looks like Israel is planting fake evidence to spin a narrative. That does neither mean nor imply that there was no attack or that that was not planned. The "40 beheaded babies" turned out to be bullshit and I bet this will too. Even if the printouts turn out to be genuine, the reporting on it seems to be disingenuous and tries to make Hamas, and by extension the Palestinian people, look even worse than they are to make the over the top retaliation more palatable to the world by dehumanizing the enemy.
I have no doubt about Hamas fighters invading Israel. That is pretty evident. But this kind of "evidence" found on the fighters is pretty suspicious. It is as credible as the pristine passports of the terrorists found near the WTC after 9/11.
Yah, I want to see high resolution scans of those documents, check the MIC and get a statement from the printer manufacturer what country the printer was sold to. Want to place a bet it was Israel?
Yah, or maybe because it smells like bullshit. All data is based on surveys from "normal" people (non-scientists), on a topic that is highly politicized, and by practitioners of one side often followed with what looks like religious fervor. The participants distribution is neither 50/50 for the compared options nor representative for the general populace of cat owners. It is pretty safe to assume bias in the reporting. Not a single cat was actually examined by the "researchers". This has almost all the hallmarks of bad science. That it is published in a purportedly peer reviewed magazine, does not reflect well on that magazine.
A tale as old as mankind. Like 20 years ago I saw a movie. Some indie thing from France or Spain. The kind of shit that gets highly acclaimed at the Cannes film festival. In one scene there was a bricklayer reciting a poem (from the top of my head and loosely translated from German):
My grandfather was a bricklayer.
My father was a bricklayer.
I am a bricklayer, too.
But, tell me, where is my house?
I got a lot wrong initially reading that blog post (updated my comment accordingly). Though, I can sympathize with what he's saying in that screenshot specifically. If I did maintain a popular open source project I'd rather completdly remove the social aspect than try and manage it.
_cnt0 @ _cnt0 @feddit.de Posts 0Comments 73Joined 2 yr. ago
It'll likely go away with an update. But you can always check xsession log, dmesg, etc to see if there's a hint on why the screen locking process is crashing.