For negotiating with Russia? It makes sense, they're an actual ally of Russia's that they rely on. We can waggle our finger at them all we'd like, & they could do the same to us, but that doesn't mean much. If China has something to say on the matter, however, their words would carry more weight.
Also, as others have pointed out, Beijing has been making lots of moves to become a key negotiator in places where America (or the west at-large) have failed (or are otherwise unable) to step in.
Because they're sexist, that's why. They'd call these woman "unfeminine" for "acting like a man." They believe violence and power are inherently, fundamentally masculine features.
I think that'd be ok, even with this proposal, as long as you don't sell that LLM for public use. It's fine it I draw a picture of Mickey Mouse in my notebook, but if I try to sell that picture I could get in legal trouble.
The Whigs were replaced by the Republicans, who maintained control over the Federal government for nearly the entire remainder of the 19th century, forcing the Democratic party to adopt progressive policies to survive.
This is what we want, for the current Democratic Party to be replaced by a new, progressive organization, which can actually fight for us, and implement desperately-needed reforms.
It's sort of like the false vacuum. YouTube commenters are finding new ways to make the comment section even worse, and it'll spread and decay to that lower level, until they find another way to be even worse.
If he does somehow get a 2nd term, I wouldn't expect it to be much more than a figurehead position, even more than this coming term will be. He never liked the job of President, only the trappings of power and the freedom from consequences the office granted him. Now that he's been reelected, and the GOP consolidated around himself and his family, there's really not a lot he has to personally worry about, besides playing king and enacting revenge.
Tbf that was always kinda the point. It was a coined to mock the creation of White House office positions that had no legislation justifying it's existence, as opposed to the Federal Departments.
If the office was created, and position filled undemocratically, then calling that office holder a tsar makes some sense, if clearly hyperbolic.
Obviously, this one is a Senate approved appointment, so the point is diluted.
I mean, I get it. Crabs are delicious.