Zombie-Mantis @ ZombieMantis @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

408

Joined

2 yr. ago

To be fair, Leviathan is a banger middle name. Plus you can be called Levi for short :)

That movie was parody making fun of a book about how fascism can be sexy.

I think they mean to agree with the pink hoodie person.

horse

Same reason they have multiple camera crews these days, I would think? 🤔

What's the problem?

Unfortunately, yes.

The point of the Senate is that it's a more deliberative body, representing larger numbers of people, which serves to moderate the power of the House. Mind you, Congress as a whole was more powerful when the nation was founded; they've handed off power to the executive over the years, for better or worse (really, a bit of both). The House was also intended to grow with the population, and if we'd followed the general guidelines for growth the Founders suggested, we'd have a House with more than 600 members. The number of seats was capped ~90 years ago, because Congress didn't want to fund another renovation of the capitol building to fit more people. Also keep in mind that the States had a more uniform population distribution when the country was founded. You didn't have California and Nebraska sitting with orders of magnitude of difference between them, so the difference in representation in the Senate was not nearly as significant as it is today.

Wether we need a secondary deliberative body in the legislature or not is a matter of debate and opinion. I can see why you'd want one, but I can also understand why people would think it's not useful anymore.

There are other proposals to solve the Senate's disproportionate nature, such as apportioning Senate seats by state population. Most proposals I've seen for that would leave the Senate with a little more than a hundred seats (with a minimum of 1 seat per state), which would (mostly) solve the problem and make it closer to the house in terms of proportionality. Of course, it all depends on the exact implementation.

It depends. I've known some people who use it to say they're the crazy type or Republican too, but I've also heard it used by more moderate Republicans and conservatives, who don't want to associate with Trump and the other authoritarians in the right-wing of the party. I've also seen it used by non-aligned voters, who don't have another label for themselve, so just default to "libertarian", because they've heard it before.

A compelling argument, however:

Rev's up the skin flayer 9000

They are, especially in the south. Or did you sleep in on 1/6? Express your democratic right, or loose it.

It's like trying to make a person learn how to play the flute by just handing them a flute. If they don't know how to assemble it, clean it, hold it, press the keys, and proper embouchure, they're never going to learn how to play the instrument.

That was one of my favorite activities when I was a kid. We had a steam behind our home, I made a tiny little ecosystem for frogs and crawdads to hang out in, between the flowing parts of the stream 😊 fond memories.

As a general rule, Conservatives don't believe in mental health. Mental illness is thought of as a personal failing, and an issue to be solved by an individual "toughening-up".

:3

No no, he wants to be the horse

Scream not working because space make deaf.

I'm getting the impression that a lot of foreigners think the American public generally supports the current healthcare system. We don't.

Complaining about our healthcare is practically a National pass time. We all want something better, but it's also one more problem in a burning pile of problems, which we have few tools to fix.

Some good news, is that we're making some small progress on that front. We're finally begging to rebuild our unions, which were dismantled decades ago, and the American public is becoming more politically engaged. Hopefully, these trends continuing a positive direction, and are resilient to being torn down again.

There is some small progress in that direction, but the organizations which would allow us to actively act have long ago been dismantled. We're only just recently begging to rebuild our unions here. I hope this time, organized labor is more resilient.