And so instead of looking at search results you looked at the section written by an AI, that is wrong so often that people regularly make fun of it, and then didn't even bother to check whether it was correct/made sense or include context for why the result of the (unknown) search terms was necessary.
I personally would argue that Wikipedia or a dictionary are more likely to be correct in most cases but I don't even know what you were looking for.
I'm just confused why you or anybody else would want that AI overview pasted here. Is it secretly just to annoy everybody and get exactly this kind of attention?
Based on the other comments from this account I guess you're a human. Then why did you post an AI overview of the two terms that is verbose and uses a partly circular definition?
If you're trying to say that they should have used the other you can say that with your own words that are likely more concise and fitting to the topic at hand.
The point in that case would be that while not intended it could be used as a programming language. The R example seems unrelated. Every language must run compiled code at one point or else the CPU wouldn't know what to do.
I would argue that its purpose as a probe outweighs its purpose as a ship, as such the specification of probe would still outweigh it being a starship by technicality.
I think it's really interesting that everyone seems to have had either a humanoid running along side the car or something aiming from their eyes that can cut/smash only certain types of things. I wonder what makes it happen.
:>
Makes me wish there was an English word for "Schadenfreude"