+1 though I feel like I'm more average when it comes techiness (if anyone feels very techy and qualified to host a survey, I'd be interested in average tech experiences here.)
It's just very rare, the Oxford English Dictionary claims that it is 400 times less common than 'excluded'. I would expect many Brits and other native speakers to get confused or at least slow down when reading it too.
Hello dear likely reddit refugee. If you want to link to a user on the Fediverse you can use this syntax @JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org. On most clients this will turn into a clickable link and (at least on Mastodon) it will notify them that they were mentioned.
Being told that I don't have them doesn't help me understand the issues professionals have with GIMP. I've heard a lot of hobbists say the same thing only to list a few features that GIMP already has and then give up because they don't actually care enough to try it for more than 5min.
I'm curious whether some professionals are the same. I suspect that some will and likely more won't but if nobody can give examples it feels weird to be arguing about it.
So if you are a professional I'd be curious to hear more.
I keep hearing this but having never really used Photoshop myself. What are all the missing features?
I'm not a professional but there hasn't been anything that I wanted to do in GIMP that I couldn't do because of its limitations and with GIMP 3.0 having non destructive editing I have no complaints other than the sometimes janky UI.
Hmm I was clearly too well behaved. Most of my knowledge of computers came through wanting to program them to do cool stuff, not bypass restrictions. The cheatiest thing I can remember doing is copying a cool puzzle game from the school computer onto a flash drive so I could play it at home, so I guess I did it backwards?
+1 though I feel like I'm more average when it comes techiness (if anyone feels very techy and qualified to host a survey, I'd be interested in average tech experiences here.)