Zeth0s @ Zeth0s @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

666

Joined

2 yr. ago

It is the same as science. Many discoveries are serendipity, they happen by chance. You need a professional to understand that that is a new discovery.

Anyone who manages to make something significant with AI is a professional.

I believe that the main problem is how companies work. If I say finance that I want to donate to an open source project half of what we are paying for the licenses of the alternative rubbish commercial product we are using now, they will simply say no. No discussion at all. We always need to find commercial entities that work via licensing to support open source tools. This is also a reason of the success of red hat compared to debian. Companies don't pay debian, I couldn't even if I would like, because they don't offer a package of enterprise licenses... That is the only option finance understand

It is crazy and a pity...

AI tools are support for professionals. For non professionals they are a toy, a magic box

Megafires has always been there in that part of Europe, simply no one cared. Now they are spreading further north...

If eu legislators could read they'd be very upset

I was in the same place same period of last year and this year was definitely hotter. I grew up there (although I don't live there anymore), in south of Italy. This year was really bad

I was on holiday in southern Europe. I was there at 43° Celsius. I know a person who witnessed 47 more southern. In places where these temperatures have been seen only over the past 10 years

I mean, it's pretty simple to know the temperature, thermometers exists. Just call someone in southern Europe and ask

The real problem is honesty of the users and rewarding system. Why do people copy and paste answers from chatgpt? Or even spend time to create bots? Because there is some kind of reward for them. The reward is what needs to change. The reward is the driving force to "cheat". Why are these people doing it? What's the reward they are after? I have no idea. But there is the problem to solve

Don't kill yourself on climate change, do what is needed and don't over think about it. It isn't helpful

These are the same companies that created a cartel to purposely jeopardize any effort to move away from fossil fuels. They wanted methane to be the future, to maintain the status quo.

And they are still lobbying against "green" legislations around the world

We shouldn't trust them, they are much worse than tesla

Title incomplete, also via bing search ads

Top 6 hours gang strong!

Density might be similar, but sodium can accumulate and release much less energy than Lithium, and it is heavier. It means that similar batteries, similar density, would need to be larger and heavier.

That's the disadvantage of sodium over Lithium

All and popular are still unreachable for me from mobile version. They are reachable from desktop. Are they trying to minimize the damage?

That's a point of honor. Public institutions in most countries are hacked because they still run servers with windows xp last updated in 1998

How can the attester attest that a bot is not using a valid browser on a valid os?

How do they manage that you need more sodium to store comparable amount of energy? Larger size?

This is the actual problem. Lithium can theoretically be recycled. Governments need to force investments in research and, once good methods are available, force recycling.

No company will do it without push

Lithium is disastrous only if not recycled.

Unfortunately recycling is expensive so less profitable

This is a big issue of eu regulations. They are needed, but don't account for non profit initiatives, in practice favoring big players