Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ZS
Posts
1
Comments
666
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Actual car companies are the same as tesla, even worst. Tesla is so popular because old car companies bribed politicians to avoid transition out of fuel, and cheated (diesel gate was the norm, not an exception).

    Unfortunately tesla is still better than other companies. And this says all about how corrupted is automotive industry

  • To be fair you are trying to use steam deck for what it was not meant to do. You are an edge case. The os was built for steam + flatpack, for games.

    It works for that. To use it as desktop os... See my comment above :D

  • You are linking sources on biases. As said it is very different. Holy mary is most often represented as white, blue eyes. That is a bias, inherited from training data (as models don't know anything else out of that).

    Average is a different things, these models do not perform averages, do not output averages, averages of the output data are not comparable with averages of input data.

    It was just to clarify the point

  • That's a bias, not an average. Similar to human biases. Models' biases are derived from humans' biases in the training data.

    Humans have biases for a male doctor and female nurse, models learn that bias unless someone intervene to identify and remove the cultural (very human) bias from the training data set

  • My comment is that they simply are not averages, that's it.

    As a simpler example, it is like saying that a polynomial plus some noise is an average... It's simply not.

    The stochastic and non linear parts are the reason these models create original images, unless overfitted.

    If it was a weighted average you'd have identical, smoothed, most likely non sensical images for identical prompts.

    And this is not the case.

    That's all my comment.

  • One can directly install ubuntu on hyper-v, without any additional 3rd party tools. They just need hyper-v enabled (it's installed by default). It's not user friendly, it's the usual gui mess as one could expect from a ms product. But at least it's preinstalled, which is convenient for a work laptop.

    Whether IT security department would allow this... It's another story

    Edit. Fixed typo

  • The main problem are companies forcing windows servers and technologies when they are not the good ones for the task.

    If one needs to set up desktops for accounting, windows is fine. But I saw companies setting shared NFS drives used by Linux severs on windows machines! Not joking!

    I know companies that even deploy kubernetes clusters on windows servers!

    Just because finding cheap windows engineers is easy, everyone has had an experience on windows to put on a cv. Than some of that cheap labor go up the hierarchy as head of a random infrastructure team because all good sys engineers moved to manage linux servers after some time, he recruits people like-minded, and in few years you ends up with a team refusing to do the right thing because "we know windows and windows can do the same as Linux and Microsoft is good for governance and Linux bad". Execs don't understand the difference and force architecture to go along because they don't believe it's worthy to rebuild a team, we are anyway using windows for accounting and execs laptops, it can't be that bad! Even accenture and mckinsey consultants us it! And they told us that wls2 is the holy grail

    Corporate IT is the peak of suboptimal tools for the job because politics and money